During a special public health review committee meeting Thursday, Michael Bryant of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) said the ability for a minister to impose orders without debate in the legislature is harmful to Albertans.
Last June, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association said police forces should focus on prevention instead of handing out tickets.
Cara Zwibel, director of the Fundamental Freedoms Program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said the legislation presents a novel challenge to civil liberties because the pandemic is quite unlike more short-lived emergencies such as an ice storm or a forest fire.
Brenda McPhail, director of privacy, technology and surveillance project for the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said in a statement that the download requirements present an “obvious” issue.
The CCLA report asserts a punitive or “stick” approach to public health is unsuccessful, now and historically: “Trying to police our way out of this pandemic is unimaginative, sometimes unconstitutional, and ineffective.”
The province revoked that power July 22 after the CCLA and other groups launched a legal challenge, arguing that giving police access to the database breached privacy protections and infringed on individuals’ constitutional rights.
Earlier this week, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) won a legal challenge to stop police across the province from peering into private health information. They also released data detailing the usage of the database up to that point by various police services.
The province recently stopped that after a legal challenge was filed by Aboriginal Legal Services, the Black Legal Action Centre (BLAC), the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) and HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario.
According to a group of human rights organizations — the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Aboriginal Legal Services, the Black Legal Action Centre, and HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario, police services across the province searched the COVID testing database 95,000 times in a matter of months.
Waterloo regional police accessed Ontario’s COVID-19 database more than 1,000 times, according to data from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) released statistics this week detailing how many times municipal police forces used Ontario’s COVID-19 database when first responders were granted the power under a now-lifted state of emergency.
Following a legal challenge that was initiated by the human rights organizations — the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Aboriginal Legal Services, the Black Legal Action Centre, and HIV and AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario — police no longer have access to the data, although the groups are still concerned about previous access and use of the information.
The board confirms it has received a letter from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association — writing on behalf of itself, Aboriginal Legal Services, Black Legal Action Centre, and HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario — that calls on the board to request an audit into what the CCLA described as the “abnormally high” rate which London police have been accessing the province’s COVID-19 database.
However a group of human rights organizations — the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Aboriginal Legal Services, the Black Legal Action Centre, and HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario — launched a lawsuit challenging the decision to release personal health information and that it “violated individuals’ statutory privacy and constitutional Charter rights.”
“It’s a very high number of queries for a small population,” said Abby Deshman, criminal justice program director for the CCLA. .”We have no idea why there would be so many queries.”
“It’s really unprecedented to share such a blanket swathe of personal health information with law enforcement,” said Abby Deshman, the director of the criminal justice program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), one of the legal groups that was a party to the lawsuit.
The province has since ended access to the database, after a legal challenge filed by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association in partnership with Aboriginal Legal Services, the Black Legal Action Centre and HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic.
In June, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association reported that Quebec alone had levelled $10 million in COVID-related fines, while the mayor of Los Angeles has authorized utilities to cut services to homes and businesses hosting large parties. In Australia, police are preparing to use drones to nab rule-breakers.
The group — Aboriginal Legal Services, the Black Legal Action Centre, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario — argued that allowing police to access personal health records violates individuals’ constitutional rights to privacy and equality.
Abby Deshman, director of the Criminal Justice Program for the CCLA, said she’s pleased Ontario “backed away from this intrusive and discriminatory measure.“We remain deeply concerned, however, about the information that police services across the province have already amassed,” said Deshman.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association is suing Newfoundland and Labrador, claiming the border restrictions violate Canadians’ right to move freely about the country. In a since-deleted tweet, CCLA executive director Michael Bryant mocked N.L. for telling people to “Stay Away,” which he pasted beside a poster for the hit play “Come From Away.” Funny guy.
Drover is joined in the challenge by lawyer Rosellen Sullivan, who is representing the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, an independent rights watchdog. They aren’t looking for compensation, but a declaration that the travel ban is unconstitutional.
Lawyers for Ms. Taylor and the CCLA argue the restrictions are without merit or basis in law, and that the travel ban violates Section 6 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which allows Canadians to move freely within the country.
Lawyers Rosellen Sullivan and John Drover are challenging the province’s COVID-19-related travel ban on behalf og the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and Newfoundland native Kim Taylor of Halifax.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and Halifax resident Kim Taylor allege the measures restricting entry to residents and essential workers violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and fall outside the province’s jurisdiction.
Cara Zwibel is a lawyer for the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. She said the issue is that the rule stigmatizes people who can’t wear masks. “We have concerns that this is an overboard rule and there will be enforcement issues. Often we have front line workers who have precarious jobs, often with low wages, and we’re asking them to enforce this mandate that most people are complying with except for people who can’t or don’t want to.”
Concerns with the iOS version of ABTraceTogether were echoed by Brenda McPhail, director of the Privacy, Surveillance, and Technology Project with the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. “The underlying technology isn’t perfect and we should understand that when using these apps and thinking about whether or not they’re effective,” McPhail said.
Noa Mendelsohn Aviv of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association said the City of Toronto violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Ontario Human Rights code, by putting the lives of homeless people in danger by denying them equal rights to life and security.
The groups, including the Black Legal Action Centre and Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said they wrote Solicitor General Sylvia Jones in April 22 outlining their concerns. They said they had received no response.
Brenda McPhail, director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association’s privacy, technology and surveillance project, described it as “a breach waiting to happen.”
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) and its partners have now served a notice of application to begin a legal challenge at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in an effort to stop the provincial government from disclosing the information to police.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) says sharing that information with police breaches provincial privacy protections and violates individuals’ constitutional rights to privacy and equality.
“At the very outset there were statements from public officials that their focus was on education [but] it quickly shifted to leaving education behind for ticket blitzes in Ottawa and enforcement,” said Deshman. “I think that has waned.”
A majority-UCP committee tasked with reviewing the Public Health Act voted Friday against calling on health zone officials, union representatives for front line health workers and CEOs of companies impacted by COVID-19 outbreaks to testify. Instead, it will invite Dr. Deena Hinshaw from the office of the chief medical officer of health and representatives of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
The CCLA said that “trying to police our way out of this pandemic is unimaginative, sometimes unconstitutional, and ineffective.”
“Actually, per capita, you’re ticketing at a higher rate than Ontario. So, it’s actually an enormous level of enforcement for the population and the public health situation that you’re facing,” said Abby Deshman, the Criminal Justice Program director with the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
The review, which comes on the heels of a CCLA report last Friday suggesting Canada is in the gravest curbs on civil liberties since the 1970 October crisis in Quebec, highlights allegations of racist behaviour.
“This report proves that we’ve got an ugly ticketing pandemic, replete with COVID carding and racial profiling, in central and eastern Canada,” Michael Bryant, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association said in a statement. “Somehow a public health crisis has been twisted into a public order crisis.”
“From the stories people sent us, primarily from Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, the organizations we talked to, we know these are the communities that are both disproportionately impacted by this pandemic, and they’re also the communities that are disproportionately impacted by fines and policing,” Abby Deshman, the director of the Criminal Justice Program with the CCLA told CTV News Channel, adding that the vast majority of people are trying their best to comply with rules.
A new report by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association shows the uneven enforcement of COVID health orders is no laughing matter.
A recent report from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association found that Canadians violating physical distancing measures racked up $13 million in fines, with many tickets being issued in Quebec, Ontario, and Nova Scotia.
“This report proves that we’ve got an ugly ticketing pandemic, replete with COVID carding and racial profiling, in central and eastern Canada,” Michael Bryant, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said in a statement.
“We received multiple reports of bylaw officers being needlessly aggressive with Black individuals walking through parks,” said Abby Deshman, director of the criminal justice program for CCLA, in a statement. “Members of the LGBTQ+ community also reported that they felt targeted by law enforcement.”
Rosellen Sullivan said the addition of American citizens to the list of travel exemptions shows the rules do not apply logically and equally to everyone. Sullivan represents the Canadian Civil Liberties Association in a lawsuit filed on behalf of a woman from Newfoundland who was initially denied entry for her mother’s funeral.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) has joined a lawsuit and has sent letters outlining its concerns to each of the provinces and territories that had banned Canadian visitors.
“When it comes to collecting information about people in ways that are lawful and privacy-protective, the devil is always in the details,” said Brenda McPhail, director of the privacy, technology and surveillance project at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
Since late May, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association has been threatening territories and provinces with charter challenges for laws prohibiting domestic travel.
Michael Bryant, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), warns that a store’s no-cash policy could inadvertently discriminate against seniors, people who are disabled, impoverished or people who just don’t have credit or debit cards.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association, which has written letters to all provinces and territories stating its opposition to such bans, has joined her in the lawsuit, which will be heard in Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court in August.
Cara Zwibel, director of the fundamental freedoms program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, is concerned about that: ” I don’t know if we want our bus drivers and our grocery cashiers to be interrogating people about their health status to try and decide who can get an exemption and who can’t.”
In late May, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association argued that the territory’s border restrictions were unconstitutional. The territory’s opposition, Yukon Party, also questioned the legality of the restrictions in an email last week.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has criticized Canadian cities for overzealously policing social distancing by failing to inform or warn individuals before imposing heavy fines, and has recently launched a Charter challenge against Newfoundland for denying a woman entry into the province to attend her mother’s funeral.
The P.E.I. government has already faced warnings from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association about its travel restrictions. In a May 15 letter issued to Justice and Public Safety Minister Bloyce Thompson, the CCLA said mobility rights are enshrined in Section 6 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Also testifying was Michael Bryant, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, who said the middle of a health crisis is not the time for parliament to pass new privacy legislation to deal with contact tracing apps.
The CCLA had penned a letter to McPhee on May 27 expressing concerns that the travel and entry restrictions the Yukon has put in place in response to the COVID-19 pandemic violates section six of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees Canadians’ mobility rights within the country. It also questioned whether the Yukon had the authority to make orders that impacted the movement of Canadians who reside outside the territory.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) has joined the lawsuit and has sent letters to each of the provinces and territories banning Canadian visitors, outlining its concerns.
Michael Bryant, director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said because of human rights provisions, employees, for example, “wouldn’t have to wear a mask if they had a disability or medical condition.”
For a “no mask, no service” policy, there are clashing freedoms of commerce, equality, liberty and the fact that the provincial law has granted special privilege to some businesses to sell to the public, during COVID-19 whereas others are closed.
During a hearing conducted by teleconference on Tuesday, lawyers representing Kim Taylor and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association requested the province provide information on the science being used to justify the ban and the criteria for enforcing it.
Lawyers challenging the provincial government’s COVID-19-related travel ban say they want to know exactly where the province is getting the “best science” on which it relies to make decisions in light of the coronavirus pandemic.
Premier Doug Ford suggested last week that businesses should be able to refuse entry to people who aren’t wearing a mask. But Michael Bryant, the executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, told the Star that wearing a mask is not mandatory in Ontario and it could be legally difficult to enforce such a rule.
Newfoundland and Labrador amended the Public Health Protection and Promotion Act on May 4 to implement a travel ban barring anyone but permanent residents and workers in essential sectors from entering the province. The bill gives power to police to potentially remove people who are not primary residents from the province. However, a lawsuit has been filed by the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) challenging the legislation.
As the Maritime provinces and Quebec continue to restrict travel, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association has gone to court to challenge recent legislation and executive orders in Newfoundland and Labrador that restrict non-residents from entering the province.
Michael Bryant, a lawyer and executive director of the CCLA, said the border closure is a clear violation of Section 6 of the constitution, which provides Canadians with the right to work or travel in any province, and the provinces need to be able to justify that violation.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association says that while it’s concerned with travel bans across the country, Newfoundland and Labrador’s is particularly problematic.The association notes the Newfoundland ban grants police powers to search, detain and remove people believed to have violated a public health order.
“We recognize the uncharted territory that we’re in, and that governments are grappling with really significant and new challenges,” said Cara Zwibel, the CCLA’s Fundamental Freedoms Program Director. “But there does have to be some accountability. There has to be some requirement when you’re restricting people’s rights to justify why we’re doing that, and saying ‘better safe than sorry’ is not sufficient for the purposes of constitutional rights. We need some evidence.”
“We had to fight hard to win from the city a commitment to take a basic life-saving measure,” said Noa Mendelsohn Aviv, Equality Program Director at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, in a statement.”We will keep fighting: to make sure they uphold this commitment, and to protect the rights of every human being, without discrimination based on housing status, race, disability or otherwise.”
Noa Mendelsohn Aviv, Equality Program Director with CCLA says they knew back in March that despite physical distancing measures across the board, there was overcrowding in the shelter system. “Something that was so terrifying for a lot of people, that they chose to leave the shelter system and started camping out in different locations across the city.”
The coronavirus is costing us more than just our health and economy. It’s no wonder the Canadian Civil Liberties Association has launched a national campaign to monitor who has been detained and fined, and why.
Abby Deshman, director of the CCLA, says Indigenous prisoners, which make up more than 35 per cent of Canada’s prison population, are particularly at risk.
Deshman noted that when the CCLA speaks to inmates, “one of the recurring things that comes up is that people are extremely scared, and things are very tense.”
“There’s a great deal of hype and a lot of push for the idea,” McPhail said of tracing apps. “We are rapidly considering a wide range of measures that are rights infringing during this pandemic.”
Sean Johnston and the organizations that include the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the Canadian Prison Law Association are trying to compel the government to take proactive steps to ensure prisoners’ safety.
Michael Bryant of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association explains how COVID-19 is a public health matter and that police should be informing the public. During the shutdown, he says, police powers have become too vague — and in some cases, unconstitutional.
“The basis is that this is a restriction of rights that are protected by the Charter, and it’s not reasonable or justified,” said Cara Zwibel, director of the CCLA’s Fundamental Freedoms Program.
NDP Solicitor General Mike Farnworth’s Order 139 “contains the worst approach to emergency management, removing sober second thought exactly when it’s needed,” said Canadian Civil Liberties Association executive director Michael Bryant.
Bryant also said temperature checks must also respect an individual’s right to privacy, and people should be made aware of what information they’re consenting to share.
Winnipeg, Bryant said, got it right by telling bylaw officers to be education ambassadors who issue advice and warnings before writing up tickets and uploading all their interaction data online for the public to see.
Michael Bryant, executive director of Canadian Civil Liberties Association and former Attorney General of Ontario joins BNN Bloomberg to discuss what rights Canadians have during times of the pandemic and concerns over privacy, ticketing, and freedom.
The CCLA and a coalition of advocacy groups hit Toronto with a legal action over the state of the shelter system during the coronavirus pandemic. The groups argue the state of city shelter standards and 24-hour respite centres violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
It’s no wonder the Canadian Civil Liberties Association has launched a national campaign to monitor who has been detained and fined, and why.
The fines are “absurdly disproportionate to the alleged offence,” says Michael Bryant, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA).
“In regions where there isn’t consumer choice, this is a very big decision … because it threatens people’s food security if they have no other place to go to get food,” Bryant said.
“It really is an extraordinary invasion of privacy for a democratic state to request,” said Brenda McPhail, the director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association’s privacy, technology and surveillance project.
“If you are going to create new offences, you need to get the infrastructure in place for people to challenge them before you start handing out tickets,” said Cara Zwibel, a lawyer with the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
“When you hand out tickets this big for what amounts to otherwise benign, harmless behaviour, what you’re doing is you’re putting an undue burden on a vulnerable population,” Bryant says.
“It’s an outlet for rage and anxiety that ends up pressuring police and bylaw officers to over-ticket instead of educating the public and warning people,” Bryant said.
“The trick, of course, is ensuring that we find ways to get the necessary information that are proportionate and minimally intrusive for the humans whose health is at the core of the data collection efforts —even if the proportionality analysis may look a little different during a pandemic,” McPhail wrote.
“I think it’s a combination of general COVID anxiety (officers) are under and power-tripping, which arise from these new powers,” Bryant said. “This is not constitutional kosher. Politicians cannot be directing police.”
In Ontario, advocates had to fight for homeless shelters to be prioritized for COVID-19 testing.
Cara Zwibel of CCLA said of Bill 10 that “it was passed with very little scrutiny and very little time for thought and debate.”
This comes after a coalition of public-interest organizations filed legal proceedings against the City over what they’re calling “deplorable” conditions in the city’s shelter system and respite sites amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
The financial hit for Nelson? $880. Or, as Michael Bryant, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), puts it: “A month of groceries for a family of four.”
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association wrote to Justice Minister Sonia LeBel and Public Security Minister Geneviève Guilbault, making several recommendations, including the early release of non-violent offenders, and providing emergency guidelines for Crown prosecutors and police forces.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has said they are tracking tickets and will consider contesting them when this is over.
Bryant said more and more, it feels like there’s a “presumption of guilt as soon as somebody steps outside.”
Canadian Civil Liberties Association says the provincial order is an ‘extraordinary invasion of privacy’.
Lawyers from the Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario, the Black Legal Action Centre, the HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario, The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and Aboriginal Legal Services filed paperwork with the courts on Friday.
“Providing personal health information directly to law enforcement, however, is an extraordinary invasion of privacy.”
They say the city is still using bunk beds and other sleep settings where beds are less than one metre apart, and not the two metres called for by provincial and federal health standards.
CCLA wisely counters that “police officers, like all first responders, must operate under the assumption that everyone they come into contact with is a potential active carrier.”
“Tenants have a right to know what the landlord is going to do with it and what the consequences will be,” said Brenda McPhail of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association
The result is that civil liberty is suddenly unequal across the country, according to Michael Bryant, executive director and general counsel at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. A citizen’s freedom in Montreal is not the same as in Toronto, and different still in Vancouver, because of new untested municipal and provincial laws.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and other advocacy groups are sounding the alarm about the legality of the province providing first responders, including police, with the names, addresses and dates of birth of people who have tested positive for COVID-19.
According to the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, at the time of the order, Ontario’s privacy commissioner objected to the move, but the regulation was passed despite the province being unable to demonstrate it was necessary for public safety.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association called police access to coronavirus data an “extreme invasion of privacy”, and are now asking the Ontario solicitor general to justify the move.
“A lot of people who have been in touch with us are people who were trying to do their best to follow rapidly evolving rules,” said Abby Deshman, the director of the criminal justice program, adding they’ve been given tickets ranging from $880 to $1,200 for infractions such as walking on the grass in a park with their children.
“The freedom to peacefully assemble and the freedom to associate in many parts of the country have been largely wiped out, essentially eliminated, because of all these emergency orders that are in place to prohibit large gatherings … they prohibit small gatherings too,” said Cara Zwibel, director of the fundamental freedoms program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
“We’re looking for trends and potentially, examples of enforcement practices across Canada,” CCLA executive director Michael Bryant said Wednesday.”
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association, which pushed the case, called Ottawa’s decision a belated good day for justice.
“We have grave concerns that the order is unconstitutional,” said the letter signed by Michael Bryant
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association says it’s going to fight for citizens nabbed for municipal recreational infractions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Some of the most obvious and harmful COVID-19 misinformation might be adequately addressed by these laws that have been on the books for years. Let’s give them a chance to work before we open the Pandora’s box of criminalizing misinformation.
“The failure to immediately facilitate social distancing in existing City shelters and respite centres, and urgent action to house is a breach of the constitutional rights of those who are precariously housed,” the statement read.
“When you get really broad, vague laws, people have a very hard time complying with them and it’s an unjustifiable restriction on people’s liberty,” said Abby Deshman, director of the criminal justice program with the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association is calling for governments to impose mandatory data tracking-based measures to combat COVID-19 only as a “last resort,” and to go beyond existing privacy laws to safeguard citizens’ rights in any use of technology to fight the pandemic.
Amid growing public and government interest in using data and technology for contact tracing and other measures to combat COVID-19, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association is calling on Canadian authorities to ensure any such programs solve real public health needs, preserve privacy rights and protect the vulnerable.
“We have significant concerns about the constitutionality of this order,” wrote Abby Deshman, the association’s criminal justice program director.
Bryant said the restrictions designed to limit the spread of the novel coronavirus are an abuse of power because the recreation activities involved are usually harmless and should be met with warnings rather than costly fines.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has received numerous complaints so far over how the new rules are being enforced in jurisdictions across the country, says CCLA executive director Michael Bryant.
Michael Bryant, head of the the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said he’s received reports of Nunavut RCMP knocking on people’s doors to ensure they are following mandatory self-isolation orders.
Michael Bryant, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said he is working with Ifedi and assessing whether the CCLA will intervene in the case, which he said “raises the possibility of racial profiling.”
The CCLA launched an online form asking people who have been ticketed or charged to report their experience. It aims to use the information to scrutinize abuse of emergency powers and whom they affect.
With bylaw officers and police across Canada dishing out tickets and charges to people accused of breaking emergency orders during the COVID-19 pandemic, a national human-rights organization wants to hear from anyone caught in the crackdown.
The idea was pioneered by Asian countries that have had success combatting the virus, and now it’s being implemented across Europe
“Where some see economic collapse, others see economic opportunity,” said McPhail. “We need to guard very carefully…
In a phone interview on Wednesday, Ifedi said he was unfairly singled out by the bylaw officer on Saturday at around 7:30 p.m. There were others in the park…
“When enforcement is unfair and arbitrary, people become less compliant and more defiant. We cannot police our way out of a pandemic,” the CCLA wrote in a social media post…
Brenda McPhail, who is the Canadian Civil Liberties Association Director of Privacy, Technology and Surveillance joined….
According to the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, which is on the lookout for abuses of emergency powers, the problem thus far seems most acute in Ottawa.
At some point this pandemic, in some jurisdictions, stopped being about public health and started being about public order, because politicians weren’t seeing the behaviour that they wanted out of their constituents
In an open letter to Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson and Ottawa Police Chief Peter Sloly, CCLA executive director and general counsel Michael Bryant wrote Monday that police and bylaw officers should be educating, informing and then warning people before issuing tickets under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act for disobeying guidelines aimed at slowing the spread of COVID-19.
“Are the tenants consenting to giving up all their privacy rights informed or are they being tricked? Does Naborly truly have tenants’ consent to defame them?” he said.
There were 43 tickets issued, including two tickets totalling $2,010 issued to someone who was in a closed park and wouldn’t give his name to authorities…
Brenda McPhail, director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association’s Privacy, Surveillance, and Technology Project, said in a….
Michael Bryant, head of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said he is concerned about the protocol not being made public. He said his biggest concern is that in practice, unconscious biases…
We see here and there, among the many, extraordinary, unprecedented restrictions on our freedoms in Canada, our authorities begin to drift from the solid ground of public health justifications for restricting our liberties, toward a fear-based model of suppression.
The CBA’s call echoes that expressed by dozens of other advocates for prisoners, including the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario.
The powers of the provinces under emergency legislation are substantial, and we need to ensure their exercise is authorized by law, justified,” says the CCLA. “And that actions taken in an emergency don’t simply become our ‘new normal.’”
As the late Alan Borovoy, former general counsel of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, once put it, “The source of the most insidious peril is not evil wrongdoers seeking to do harm, but parochial bureaucrats seeking to do good.”
Civil liberties advocacy groups, most notably the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, have argued that closed quarter environments like prisons are breeding grounds for highly infectious diseases like COVID-19 and stressed the need for the release of low-risk offenders.
Canadian Civil Liberties Association Fundamental Freedoms Program director Car Zwibel said the order is “creating a fiction that meetings closed to the public are, in law, to be considered open.”
And, she said, while this is problematic, it may be in part to deal with the fact that, under B.C.’s Community Charter, there are certain requirements that must be met before a closed meeting can be held.
Michael Bryant of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association said the focus on the federal government’s emergency power is “misled because the level of government having the biggest impact on our lives is provincial, not federal.”
“All the other quarantine powers are provincial, and the enforcement of the Emergencies Act is done by the provinces,” explained Bryant
“Emergency measures acts give governments exceptional powers to deal with exceptional circumstances,” said Brenda McPhail, the director of the privacy technology surveillance project at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
“But with those exceptional powers, just like the comic book, comes an exceptional responsibility to the public.”
“If it’s a measure of last resort and the police exercise their discretion in a way that puts public health first … then there is legal authorization to do this,” said Michael Bryant, the association’s Executive Director
Give us all the data you collect about your customers and let us at city hall figure out how we want to use it.
Canada’s prison officials consider how to stall coronavirus spread
‘We literally are still in tactical operational response and dealing day by day,’ says CBRM mayor
If you’re locked inside, thank the British Empire for the laws that make it possible.
…with our Constitution,” reads a recent statement from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, which admits it cannot stay on top…
…response to flatten the curve of the pandemic, wrote Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) executive director Michael Bryant…
As the COVID-19 pandemic tightens its grip on the province, it may be time to consider letting prisoners who pose a limited risk to the community out of jail.
Civil liberties advocacy groups, most notably, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have argued that closed quarter…
…they’ve got to follow the rule of law too,” wrote the Canadian Civil Liberties Association in a tweet about The Logic’s article….
As N.W.T.’s public health office urges isolation, prisoners are at higher risk, say defence lawyers
Further, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association tweeted that it has learned that no…
Armed forces on stand-by to provide emergency help to governments
Corrections Canada says prisoners being monitored, visits and absences curtailed
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association is questioning the Nova Scotia government’s moves to close public spaces and beef up provincial border checks amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
More than a dozen defence lawyers are urgently calling on the territory to temporarily release as many inmates as possible from NWT jails
‘Snitch lines’ can create fear and division, according to the head of Canada’s civil liberties watchdog
But, cautioned Canadian Civil Liberties Association executive director Michael Bryant, “it…
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the leaders of Canada’s provinces and territories will speak by phone tonight to discuss the possibility..…
Des États misent sur la coercition pour faire respecter les mesures de distanciation sociale. Québec souhaite pour l’instant éviter de recourir à cette approche.
In a bid to curb the spread of COVID-19 behind bars, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association is urging Ottawa to release some prisoners and limit further incarceration.
Courts ready to maintain rule of law in face of government emergency powers
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has called on Ottawa to “to…
In France, for example, there are now 100,000 police officers roaming the streets because people refused to stop mingling in public places
B.C. emergency act gives B.C. minister warrantless entry, seizure, evacuation powers
Taiwan is credited with sharply limiting the spread of coronavirus on the island by pairing and analyzing the electronic health and travel..…
…visas expire. Michael Bryant, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said his organization has been in..
Bryant, Executive Director and General Counsel for the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, expressed concern about the vagueness…
COVID-19 crisis Michael Bryant, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, told CBC News that barring..
Those who are symptomatic with COVID-19. (The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has already said that barring Canadians from flights…
Michael Bryant, a lawyer and executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said the modern iteration of the…