Yukon Court Strikes Down Parts of SCAN Act as Unconstitutional Infringement on Security of the Person

TORONTO —  Harini Sivalingam, Director of the Equality Program of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, made the following statement:

Today, in Wright v. Yukon, the Supreme Court of Yukon struck down a provision of the Loi sur la sécurité des communautés et des quartiers (SCAN Act) for infringing Yukon residents’ section 7 Charte rights to security of the person.

This case challenges the constitutionality of the power of the state to instigate evictions under subsection 3(2) of the SCAN Act, under which anonymous complaints can trigger broad law enforcement powers, including state enabled evictions of residents from their homes. The CCLA, an intervenor in the case, argued that SCAN Act evictions are unconstitutional and disproportionately impact vulnerable and marginalized communities, such as Indigenous people.

The CCLA welcomes the Court’s decision that subsection 3(2) of the SCAN Act causes significant psychological stress and anxiety to those who are subjected to evictions under the scheme without sufficient notice or procedural fairness. The Court stated that the SCAN Act interferes with Yukoners’ ability to make personal life choices to ensure a safe home for themselves and their families.

In recognizing that evictions under the SCAN Act can often lead to homelessness, the Court determined that such evictions negatively effected the physical and mental health of those impacted. The Court also ruled that the process of evictions under the Yukon SCAN scheme were procedurally unfair with many glaring deficiencies, including the extremely short notice period of 5 days.

The Court agreed with CCLA’s argument that there are less extreme measures to fulfill the objectives of the SCAN Act that do not require evictions without warning, disclosure, or ability to respond to the eviction.

While we are pleased with the Court’s conclusion on the section 7 violations, the CCLA is disappointed that the Court did not also find an infringement of equality rights under section 15 of the Charte. It is clear that the SCAN Act disproportionately impacts Indigenous people, who are overrepresented in the unhoused population as well as the criminal justice system.

L'ACLC remercie les conseillers juridiques pro bono Brent Olthuis, KC et Fraser Harland d'Olthuis van Ert, pour leur représentation dans cette affaire.

Read the Court’s decision ICI