News and Analysis

Taking the fight for inclusive sex-education in Ontario to…

On Tuesday, Aug. 14, thousands of Ontario teachers and activists gathered at Queen’s Park in Toronto to protest the government’s repeal of the 2015 sex-education curriculum.

The message was clear: The 2015 curriculum protects students, informs them of their rights, and, for the first time, recognizes the existence of same-sex relationships and families.

Even if the government wishes to review the 2015 sex-ed curriculum, there is no need to repeal the existing one until such a review is completed.

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association was proud to stand with teachers, students and others who are fighting for an inclusive and informative sex-ed curriculum in Ontario.

Last week, we issued a letter to Ontario’s Minister of Education Lisa Thompson, and we have not received a response to it, nor have we received a directive on sex-ed from the government. The repeal is a dangerous and discriminatory act and we will take the fight to the Superior Court of Justice if we have to.

 

Event hIghlights

CCLA stands with the Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario and all others who are fighting for an inclusive sex-ed curriculum, free of discrimination.

The Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario has said that it will “vigorously defend” teachers who teach the modern 2015 sex-ed curriculum.

“We will stand shoulder to shoulder with you, we will go to the Superior Court of Justice, and we will stop the (1998) curriculum in its tracks,” says CCLA’s Michael Bryant.

IN THE NEWS

CityNewsOntario elementary teachers protest sex-ed rollback at Queen’s Park

CBC Toronto: Proposed sex-ed changes a violation of charter rights, CCLA says

Toronto Star: More legal challenges on the way over Ford government’s outdated sex-ed curriculum

News and Analysis

Ontario’s policing reform legislation can still be improved

UPDATE: Ontario’s policing reform legislation was passed on March 9, 2018. Bill 175, as amended by the committee, and as passed on Third Reading can be found here.

Yesterday, Ontario’s provincial government concluded its Committee hearings on the Safer Ontario Act, legislation that would bring significant changes to Ontario’s system of police oversight and accountability. The CCLA appeared before the Committee to recommend several necessary amendments to the proposed legislation.

The Canadian Civilian Liberties Association has long advocated for policing reform in Ontario. For decades, policing in the province has been by plagued by accountability, oversight, and transparency deficits. A legislative overhaul of Ontario’s antiquated Police Services Act is necessary to begin to remedy these deficits.

The Safer Ontario Act primarily attempts to bolster accountability, oversight, and transparency in Ontario by implementing the majority of Justice Tulloch’s recommendations in his Report of the Independent Police Oversight Review. However, Justice Tulloch’s recommendations arose out of public consultations that revealed alarming levels of distrust of Ontario’s police services and their oversight and accountability bodies, including a widespread concern regarding systemic discrimination in Ontario policing. While many of the Safer Ontario Act’s proposed reforms could help tackle this pervasive problem of distrust, substantial efforts will be needed to ensure that any new oversight and accountability bodies are truly independent of the police services which they oversee. Substantial efforts will also be needed to ensure that any new oversight and accountability bodies are adequately funded, and are willing to use the powers they may be given.

Chief among our recommendations is that the government’s proposed legislation should be amended to provide more robust powers to civilian authorities who are charged with overseeing police services. Public officials and oversight boards must play an active, informed role on issues that have a significant impact on residents’ Charter and Code-protected rights, such as the practice of carding or the general issue of racial or social profiling. As we argue in our submissions, civilian authorities are often unnecessarily hindered in their oversight and accountability obligations by police services who maintain that attempts to address these issues would amount to interference with their operational independence. Accordingly, we recommend several amendments to strengthen and clarify the power and responsibility of civilian authorities to make and implement policing policies and directives, as well as several amendments that would require policies and directives to be publicly available information.

Click here to read the transcript of our evidence

Click here to read our written submissions

en_CAEnglish (Canada)
fr_CAFrançais du Canada en_CAEnglish (Canada)