{"id":8902,"date":"2023-08-17T14:30:13","date_gmt":"2023-08-17T18:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?p=8902"},"modified":"2023-08-22T15:52:20","modified_gmt":"2023-08-22T19:52:20","slug":"supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/la-cour-supreme-clarifie-le-role-des-avocats-commis-doffice-amicus-pour-les-accuses-non-representes\/","title":{"rendered":"La Cour supr\u00eame clarifie le r\u00f4le des avocats commis d'office (amicus) pour les accus\u00e9s non repr\u00e9sent\u00e9s"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Le 28 juillet 2023, la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada a rendu sa d\u00e9cision dans <\/span>R. c. Kahsai<\/em>, 2023 CSC 20. M. Kahsai a \u00e9t\u00e9 accus\u00e9 d'infractions criminelles et a choisi de ne pas \u00eatre repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par un avocat lors de son proc\u00e8s. Le juge du proc\u00e8s a d\u00e9sign\u00e9 un avocat pour assister le tribunal pendant le proc\u00e8s, appel\u00e9 un <\/span>amicus<\/em>. <\/span>Le r\u00f4le de <\/span>amicus<\/em> est d\u00e9termin\u00e9 par le tribunal, ils ne repr\u00e9sentent pas l'accus\u00e9.<\/span> En appel, M. Kahsai a soutenu qu'il y avait eu une erreur judiciaire en partie parce que le r\u00f4le attribu\u00e9 \u00e0 <\/span>amicus <\/em>n\u2019impliquait pas de prendre des mesures ou de pr\u00e9senter des arguments qu\u2019un avocat de la d\u00e9fense aurait pu pr\u00e9senter. La Cour supr\u00eame a statu\u00e9 qu'il n'y avait pas eu d'erreur judiciaire et a expliqu\u00e9 le r\u00f4le <\/span>amicus <\/em>peut jouer dans les cas o\u00f9 un accus\u00e9 n\u2019est pas repr\u00e9sent\u00e9. La Cour s'est appuy\u00e9e sur les arguments de l'ACLC et d'autres intervenants.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

L'\u00e9quit\u00e9 d'un proc\u00e8s au Canada d\u00e9pend, en partie, d'une proc\u00e9dure contradictoire. Cela signifie que la poursuite, qui repr\u00e9sente la Couronne, et la d\u00e9fense, qui repr\u00e9sente l'accus\u00e9, pr\u00e9sentent et d\u00e9fendent leur cause. La Couronne et la d\u00e9fense sont g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement repr\u00e9sent\u00e9es par des avocats. S\u2019il n\u2019y a pas d\u2019avocat pour la d\u00e9fense et que l\u2019accus\u00e9 ne d\u00e9fend pas sa cause, le proc\u00e8s risque d\u2019\u00eatre in\u00e9quitable. Certaines parties de la preuve ou du droit pourraient ne pas \u00eatre abord\u00e9es, et le tableau qui se d\u00e9gagera du proc\u00e8s pourrait \u00eatre incomplet ou inexact.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Un accus\u00e9 peut ne pas avoir d\u2019avocat pour de nombreuses raisons diff\u00e9rentes, notamment s\u2019il a d\u2019importants probl\u00e8mes mentaux, comportementaux ou cognitifs. Dans le m\u00eame temps, un accus\u00e9 a le droit constitutionnel de d\u00e9cider comment pr\u00e9senter et argumenter sa cause. Une question centrale dans <\/span>Kahsa\u00ef<\/em> \u00e9tait de savoir comment \u00e9quilibrer \u00e9quitablement ces consid\u00e9rations lorsqu'un accus\u00e9 n'est pas repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par un avocat et qu'un tribunal nomme <\/span>amicus<\/em>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Comme l'a soutenu l'ACLC et comme l'a expliqu\u00e9 la Cour supr\u00eame aux paragraphes 45 et 64, le r\u00f4le de <\/span>amicus<\/em> peut \u00eatre adapt\u00e9 et adapt\u00e9 aux besoins d\u2019un cas individuel\u00a0:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

[45] Le droit de l\u2019accus\u00e9 de contr\u00f4ler sa propre d\u00e9fense restreint les fonctions contradictoires qui<\/span>amicus<\/em>peut supposer. Comme l'a soulign\u00e9 l'intervenante l'Association canadienne des libert\u00e9s civiles,\u202f<\/em><\/span>amicus<\/em>ne peut pas pr\u00e9senter d\u2019arguments ni chercher \u00e0 obtenir des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve qui contrediraient les moyens de d\u00e9fense ou les th\u00e9ories soulev\u00e9s par l\u2019accus\u00e9 (voir SI, \u00e0 la p. 8). Dans le m\u00eame temps, le choix du d\u00e9fendeur de se repr\u00e9senter lui-m\u00eame n'emp\u00eachera pas<\/span>amicus<\/em>de supposer<\/span>tout<\/em>\u202f<\/em>r\u00f4le contradictoire, car le droit de contr\u00f4ler sa propre d\u00e9fense ne donne pas \u00e0 l'accus\u00e9 le droit de d\u00e9terminer l'assistance dont le tribunal a besoin. [\u2026]<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

[64] En r\u00e9sum\u00e9, dans la grande majorit\u00e9 des cas, les responsabilit\u00e9s du juge du proc\u00e8s et de la Couronne suffiront \u00e0 garantir l\u2019\u00e9quit\u00e9 du proc\u00e8s. Une fois qu'il est d\u00e9termin\u00e9 que<\/span>amicus<\/em>\u202f<\/em>est n\u00e9cessaire, le juge du proc\u00e8s conserve un large pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire pour nommer<\/span>amicus<\/em>avec des fonctions qui r\u00e9pondent aux besoins d'un cas. Cela peut inclure des fonctions contradictoires lorsque cela est n\u00e9cessaire pour l\u2019\u00e9quit\u00e9 du proc\u00e8s \u2013 par exemple, pour r\u00e9tablir l\u2019\u00e9quilibre dans une proc\u00e9dure lorsqu\u2019un accus\u00e9 choisit de se repr\u00e9senter lui-m\u00eame et ne pr\u00e9sente aucune d\u00e9fense valable. En adaptant la port\u00e9e du r\u00f4le du<\/span>amicus<\/em>, le juge consid\u00e9rera la nature du r\u00f4le de<\/span>amicus<\/em>\u202f<\/em>en tant qu'ami du tribunal et les circonstances d'une affaire, y compris la mani\u00e8re dont l'accus\u00e9 exerce ses droits constitutionnels et ce qui est n\u00e9cessaire pour garantir un proc\u00e8s \u00e9quitable. Bien qu'il existe des limites n\u00e9cessaires aux fonctions contradictoires qui<\/span>amicus<\/em>peut fonctionner, la port\u00e9e est suffisamment large pour tenir compte de ce qui est n\u00e9cessaire \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9quit\u00e9 du proc\u00e8s dans une affaire particuli\u00e8re.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Vous pouvez lire la d\u00e9cision de la Cour supr\u00eame<\/span>ici<\/span><\/a> et le m\u00e9moire de l'ACLC<\/span>ici<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

L'ACLC remercie Sarah Rankin et Heather Ferg de McKay Ferg LLP pour leur excellent\u202f<\/em><\/span>pro bono<\/em> repr\u00e9sentation dans ce cas.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t

\u00c0 propos de l\u2019association canadienne sur les libert\u00e9s civiles<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

L\u2019ACLC est un organisme ind\u00e9pendant \u00e0 but non lucratif qui compte des sympathisant.e.s dans tout le pays. Fond\u00e9 en 1964, c\u2019est un organisme qui \u0153uvre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle du Canada \u00e0 la protection des droits et des libert\u00e9s civiles de toute sa population.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les m\u00e9dias<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Pour d'autres commentaires, veuillez nous contacter \u00e0\u00a0media@ccla.org<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les mises \u00e0 jour en direct<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Veuillez continuer \u00e0 vous r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0\u00a0cette page<\/a>\u00a0et \u00e0 nos plateformes de m\u00e9dias sociaux. On est dessus\u00a0Instagram<\/u><\/a>,\u00a0Facebook<\/u><\/a>, Twitter<\/u><\/a> et Ciel bleu<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Le 28 juillet 2023, la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada a rendu sa d\u00e9cision dans l'affaire R. c. Kahsai, 2023 CSC 20. M. Kahsai a \u00e9t\u00e9 accus\u00e9 d'infractions criminelles et a choisi de ne pas...","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":4661,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,124,83],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-8902","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-criminal-justice","8":"category-fair-trial-rights","9":"category-fair-trial-due-process-sentencing"},"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court clarifies role of court-appointed lawyers (amicus) for unrepresented accused persons - CCLA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/la-cour-supreme-clarifie-le-role-des-avocats-commis-doffice-amicus-pour-les-accuses-non-representes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court clarifies role of court-appointed lawyers (amicus) for unrepresented accused persons - CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/la-cour-supreme-clarifie-le-role-des-avocats-commis-doffice-amicus-pour-les-accuses-non-representes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-17T18:30:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-22T19:52:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Shakir Rahim\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shakir Rahim\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court clarifies role of court-appointed lawyers (amicus) for unrepresented accused persons - CCLA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-17T18:30:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-22T19:52:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/35562d57d70da00846c5ea734c8000be\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CRIMINAL JUSTICE\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Supreme Court clarifies role of court-appointed lawyers (amicus) for unrepresented accused persons\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/35562d57d70da00846c5ea734c8000be\",\"name\":\"Shakir Rahim\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/734b923331df40e7490b17cec23eb2b3?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/734b923331df40e7490b17cec23eb2b3?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Shakir Rahim\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/shakir\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court clarifies role of court-appointed lawyers (amicus) for unrepresented accused persons - CCLA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/la-cour-supreme-clarifie-le-role-des-avocats-commis-doffice-amicus-pour-les-accuses-non-representes\/","og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court clarifies role of court-appointed lawyers (amicus) for unrepresented accused persons - CCLA","og_url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/la-cour-supreme-clarifie-le-role-des-avocats-commis-doffice-amicus-pour-les-accuses-non-representes\/","og_site_name":"CCLA","article_published_time":"2023-08-17T18:30:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-22T19:52:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Shakir Rahim","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Shakir Rahim","Estimation du temps de lecture":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/","name":"Supreme Court clarifies role of court-appointed lawyers (amicus) for unrepresented accused persons - CCLA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg","datePublished":"2023-08-17T18:30:13+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-22T19:52:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/35562d57d70da00846c5ea734c8000be"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg","width":2000,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-clarifies-role-of-court-appointed-lawyers-amicus-for-unrepresented-accused-persons\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CRIMINAL JUSTICE","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Supreme Court clarifies role of court-appointed lawyers (amicus) for unrepresented accused persons"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/","name":"CCLA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/35562d57d70da00846c5ea734c8000be","name":"Shakir Rahim","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/734b923331df40e7490b17cec23eb2b3?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/734b923331df40e7490b17cec23eb2b3?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Shakir Rahim"},"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/shakir\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8902"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8902\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8921,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8902\/revisions\/8921"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}