{"id":8479,"date":"2023-01-27T15:13:41","date_gmt":"2023-01-27T20:13:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?p=8479"},"modified":"2023-01-27T15:20:59","modified_gmt":"2023-01-27T20:20:59","slug":"supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/la-cour-supreme-maintient-limportance-de-la-proportionnalite-dans-les-condamnations-penales\/","title":{"rendered":"La Cour supr\u00eame maintient l'importance de la proportionnalit\u00e9 dans la d\u00e9termination de la peine p\u00e9nale"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

L'ACLC accueille favorablement les d\u00e9cisions de la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada dans <\/span>R contre Hills <\/span><\/i>et <\/span>R. c. Hilbach, <\/span><\/i>qui examinent tous deux la constitutionnalit\u00e9 des peines minimales obligatoires. La peine minimale obligatoire en cause dans <\/span>Collines <\/span><\/i>a \u00e9t\u00e9 invalid\u00e9e pour violation de l'article 12 de la <\/span>Charte, <\/span><\/i>alors que la majorit\u00e9 de la Cour a confirm\u00e9 les peines minimales obligatoires qui \u00e9taient en cause dans <\/span>Hilbach. <\/span><\/i>Bien qu'elles ne soient pas pertinentes pour les d\u00e9cisions de la Cour, il convient de noter que les peines minimales obligatoires en cause dans ces deux affaires ont \u00e9t\u00e9 abrog\u00e9es par le Parlement.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Lorsque ces affaires ont \u00e9t\u00e9 port\u00e9es devant la Cour d'appel de l'Alberta, celle-ci a propos\u00e9 de r\u00e9viser l'approche dominante en mati\u00e8re de peines minimales obligatoires, en \u00e9liminant essentiellement le principe de proportionnalit\u00e9 comme principe directeur de la d\u00e9termination de la peine et en le rel\u00e9guant \u00e0 un simple facteur parmi de nombreux facteurs \u00e0 prendre en consid\u00e9ration.<\/span>. <\/span><\/i>La Cour d'appel de l'Alberta a rejet\u00e9 l'id\u00e9e que le <\/span>Charte <\/span><\/i>la protection constitutionnelle contre les peines ou traitements cruels et inusit\u00e9s (inscrite \u00e0 l'article 12) devrait servir de frein constitutionnel aux peines manifestement disproportionn\u00e9es. Dans son intervention sur ces appels, l'ACLC a fait valoir avec force que l'article 12 servait de frein important aux peines manifestement disproportionn\u00e9es et qu'il \u00e9tait ancr\u00e9 dans le respect de la dignit\u00e9 humaine. Heureusement, la Cour a maintenu son approche des peines minimales obligatoires et a r\u00e9affirm\u00e9 le r\u00f4le de l'article 12 dans la protection contre les peines excessivement disproportionn\u00e9es. En effet, la Cour a explicitement souscrit \u00e0 la position de l'ACLC, citant notre m\u00e9moire dans sa d\u00e9cision en <\/span>Collines, <\/span><\/i>qui stipulait qu'une "personne qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 reconnue coupable d'un crime n'est pas simplement une toile sur laquelle peindre la condamnation de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9, mais reste un \u00eatre humain et un titulaire de droits dot\u00e9 de la dignit\u00e9 humaine et des droits l\u00e9gaux". <\/span>(R contre Hills, <\/span><\/i>2023 CSC 2, par. 142).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

L'ACLC est reconnaissante \u00e0 Nader Hasan et Ryann Atkins de Stockwoods LLP pour leur excellente repr\u00e9sentation pro bono dans ces appels.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Le m\u00e9moire de l'ACLC dans <\/span>Collines <\/span><\/i>est disponible <\/span>ici<\/span><\/a>, et la d\u00e9cision est accessible <\/span>ici<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Le m\u00e9moire de l'ACLC dans <\/span>Hilbach <\/span><\/i>est disponible <\/span>ici<\/span><\/a>, et la d\u00e9cision est accessible <\/span>ici<\/span><\/a>.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t

\u00c0 propos de l\u2019association canadienne sur les libert\u00e9s civiles<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

L\u2019ACLC est un organisme ind\u00e9pendant \u00e0 but non lucratif qui compte des sympathisant.e.s dans tout le pays. Fond\u00e9 en 1964, c\u2019est un organisme qui \u0153uvre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle du Canada \u00e0 la protection des droits et des libert\u00e9s civiles de toute sa population.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les m\u00e9dias<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Pour d'autres commentaires, veuillez nous contacter \u00e0\u00a0media@ccla.org<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les mises \u00e0 jour en direct<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Veuillez continuer \u00e0 vous r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0\u00a0cette page<\/a>\u00a0et \u00e0 nos plateformes de m\u00e9dias sociaux. On est dessus\u00a0Instagram<\/u><\/a>,\u00a0Facebook<\/u><\/a>, Twitter<\/u><\/a> et Ciel bleu<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L'ACLC salue les d\u00e9cisions de la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada dans R c. Hills et R. c. Hilbach, qui examinent toutes deux la constitutionnalit\u00e9 des peines minimales obligatoires. La peine minimale obligatoire en cause dans Hills a \u00e9t\u00e9 annul\u00e9e en tant que violation de l'article 12 de la Charte, tandis qu'une majorit\u00e9 de la Cour a confirm\u00e9 les peines minimales obligatoires en cause dans Hilbach. Bien qu'elles ne soient pas pertinentes pour les d\u00e9cisions de la Cour, il convient de noter que les peines minimales obligatoires en cause dans ces deux affaires ont \u00e9t\u00e9 abrog\u00e9es par le Parlement.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":5003,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,127,83,85],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-8479","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-criminal-justice","8":"category-cruel-unusual-punishment","9":"category-fair-trial-due-process-sentencing","10":"category-prisons-jails-community-supervision"},"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Maintains Importance of Proportionality in Criminal Sentencing - CCLA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/la-cour-supreme-maintient-limportance-de-la-proportionnalite-dans-les-condamnations-penales\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Maintains Importance of Proportionality in Criminal Sentencing - CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The CCLA welcomes the Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s decisions in R v. Hills and R. v. Hilbach, both of which consider the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences. The mandatory minimum at issue in Hills was struck down as a violation of section 12 of the Charter, while a majority of the Court upheld the mandatory minimum sentences that were at issue in Hilbach. Although not relevant to the Court\u2019s decisions, it is worth noting that the mandatory minimum sentences at issue in both of these cases have been repealed by Parliament.\u00a0\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/la-cour-supreme-maintient-limportance-de-la-proportionnalite-dans-les-condamnations-penales\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-01-27T20:13:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-01-27T20:20:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/COVID-prison-officer-handcuffs-P7FXGBF.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Cara Zwibel\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Cara Zwibel\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Maintains Importance of Proportionality in Criminal Sentencing - CCLA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/COVID-prison-officer-handcuffs-P7FXGBF.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-01-27T20:13:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-27T20:20:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/e5cdc9734dd59df7f49184e586aa4f51\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/COVID-prison-officer-handcuffs-P7FXGBF.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/COVID-prison-officer-handcuffs-P7FXGBF.jpg\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CRIMINAL JUSTICE\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Maintains Importance of Proportionality in Criminal Sentencing\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/e5cdc9734dd59df7f49184e586aa4f51\",\"name\":\"Cara Zwibel\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0092da99c2563b45e1c821817e16e696?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0092da99c2563b45e1c821817e16e696?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Cara Zwibel\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/cara\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Maintains Importance of Proportionality in Criminal Sentencing - CCLA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/la-cour-supreme-maintient-limportance-de-la-proportionnalite-dans-les-condamnations-penales\/","og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Maintains Importance of Proportionality in Criminal Sentencing - CCLA","og_description":"The CCLA welcomes the Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s decisions in R v. Hills and R. v. Hilbach, both of which consider the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences. The mandatory minimum at issue in Hills was struck down as a violation of section 12 of the Charter, while a majority of the Court upheld the mandatory minimum sentences that were at issue in Hilbach. Although not relevant to the Court\u2019s decisions, it is worth noting that the mandatory minimum sentences at issue in both of these cases have been repealed by Parliament.\u00a0\u00a0","og_url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/la-cour-supreme-maintient-limportance-de-la-proportionnalite-dans-les-condamnations-penales\/","og_site_name":"CCLA","article_published_time":"2023-01-27T20:13:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-01-27T20:20:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/COVID-prison-officer-handcuffs-P7FXGBF.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Cara Zwibel","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Cara Zwibel","Estimation du temps de lecture":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/","name":"Supreme Court Maintains Importance of Proportionality in Criminal Sentencing - CCLA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/COVID-prison-officer-handcuffs-P7FXGBF.jpg","datePublished":"2023-01-27T20:13:41+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-27T20:20:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/e5cdc9734dd59df7f49184e586aa4f51"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/COVID-prison-officer-handcuffs-P7FXGBF.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/COVID-prison-officer-handcuffs-P7FXGBF.jpg","width":2000,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/supreme-court-maintains-importance-of-proportionality-in-criminal-sentencing\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CRIMINAL JUSTICE","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Supreme Court Maintains Importance of Proportionality in Criminal Sentencing"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/","name":"CCLA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/e5cdc9734dd59df7f49184e586aa4f51","name":"Cara Zwibel","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0092da99c2563b45e1c821817e16e696?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0092da99c2563b45e1c821817e16e696?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Cara Zwibel"},"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/cara\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8479"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8479\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8480,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8479\/revisions\/8480"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5003"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}