{"id":8465,"date":"2022-10-28T16:10:06","date_gmt":"2022-10-28T20:10:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?p=8465"},"modified":"2023-01-13T16:30:55","modified_gmt":"2023-01-13T21:30:55","slug":"a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Une victoire \u00e0 la Cour supr\u00eame pour le droit p\u00e9nal fond\u00e9 sur la preuve"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Le 28 octobre, la Cour supr\u00eame a rendu sa d\u00e9cision dans R. c. Ndhlovu. <\/em>La d\u00e9cision est une affirmation retentissante de la protection constitutionnelle de la libert\u00e9 individuelle et de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 pour le droit p\u00e9nal de se fonder sur des preuves solides en sciences sociales - et non sur la sp\u00e9culation et la stigmatisation.<\/p>\n

L'affaire \u00e9tait une contestation constitutionnelle des dispositions qui exigent l'enregistrement obligatoire et la d\u00e9claration \u00e0 vie en vertu de la Loi sur l'enregistrement des renseignements sur les d\u00e9linquants sexuels<\/em> (SOIRA). En 2011, les juges ont \u00e9t\u00e9 priv\u00e9s de leur pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire de d\u00e9cider s'il n'est pas n\u00e9cessaire d'exiger que quelqu'un s'enregistre et signale, dans des situations o\u00f9 l'individu pr\u00e9sente peu de risques de r\u00e9cidive. De plus, les individus sont automatiquement soumis \u00e0 l'enregistrement \u00e0 vie de la SOIRA s'ils sont reconnus coupables de plus d'une infraction d\u00e9sign\u00e9e - encore une fois, ind\u00e9pendamment du fait qu'un juge conclue qu'ils pr\u00e9sentent un risque de r\u00e9cidive.<\/p>\n

L'ACLC est intervenue dans l'affaire et a exhort\u00e9 la Cour supr\u00eame \u00e0 se concentrer sur des preuves solides - et non sur des st\u00e9r\u00e9otypes infond\u00e9s sur le comportement criminel - lors de l'analyse de la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de ces dispositions. Dans Ndhlovu<\/em>, le tribunal de premi\u00e8re instance a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi de preuves sur le risque, la r\u00e9cidive et l'efficacit\u00e9 du r\u00e9gime SOIRA dans la pr\u00e9vention et la r\u00e9solution des crimes. Il a montr\u00e9 qu'il n'y avait aucune preuve que les individus cibl\u00e9s par ce r\u00e9gime couraient un risque accru de r\u00e9cidive.<\/p>\n

La Cour supr\u00eame a estim\u00e9 que le registre f\u00e9d\u00e9ral des d\u00e9linquants sexuels constituait une restriction importante \u00e0 la libert\u00e9 des individus. Les dispositions cibl\u00e9es \u00e9taient trop larges car les preuves ne montraient pas que toutes les personnes qui \u00e9taient automatiquement soumises \u00e0 ces r\u00e9gimes \u00e9taient n\u00e9cessairement plus susceptibles de commettre des crimes \u00e0 l'avenir.<\/p>\n

Pour en savoir plus, lisez notre m\u00e9moire<\/a> devant la Cour supr\u00eame.<\/p>\n

Vous pouvez lire la d\u00e9cision de la Cour supr\u00eame ici<\/a>.<\/p>\n

L'ACLC \u00e9tait habilement repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par Christine Mainville et Carly Peddle de Henein Hutchison LLP.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t

\u00c0 propos de l\u2019association canadienne sur les libert\u00e9s civiles<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

L\u2019ACLC est un organisme ind\u00e9pendant \u00e0 but non lucratif qui compte des sympathisant.e.s dans tout le pays. Fond\u00e9 en 1964, c\u2019est un organisme qui \u0153uvre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle du Canada \u00e0 la protection des droits et des libert\u00e9s civiles de toute sa population.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les m\u00e9dias<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Pour d'autres commentaires, veuillez nous contacter \u00e0\u00a0media@ccla.org<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les mises \u00e0 jour en direct<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Veuillez continuer \u00e0 vous r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0\u00a0cette page<\/a>\u00a0et \u00e0 nos plateformes de m\u00e9dias sociaux. On est dessus\u00a0Instagram<\/u><\/a>,\u00a0Facebook<\/u><\/a>, Twitter<\/u><\/a> et Ciel bleu<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le 28 octobre, la Cour supr\u00eame a rendu sa d\u00e9cision dans l'affaire R. c. Ndhlovu. La d\u00e9cision est une affirmation retentissante de la protection constitutionnelle de la libert\u00e9 individuelle et de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de fonder le droit p\u00e9nal sur des preuves solides en sciences sociales - et non sur des sp\u00e9culations et des stigmates.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":2891,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,86,133,83,134],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-8465","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-criminal-justice","8":"category-criminal-records-collateral-consequences","9":"category-criminal-records-police-record-checks-criminal-records-collateral-consequences","10":"category-fair-trial-due-process-sentencing","11":"category-sex-offender-registries"},"yoast_head":"\nA Victory at the Supreme Court for Evidence-Based Criminal Law - CCLA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"On October 28 the Supreme Court released its decision in R. v. Ndhlovu. The decision is a resounding affirmation of the constitutional protection of individual liberty and the need for criminal law to be based on sound social science evidence \u2014 not speculation and stigma.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Victory at the Supreme Court for Evidence-Based Criminal Law - CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On October 28 the Supreme Court released its decision in R. v. Ndhlovu. The decision is a resounding affirmation of the constitutional protection of individual liberty and the need for criminal law to be based on sound social science evidence \u2014 not speculation and stigma.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-28T20:10:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-01-13T21:30:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/police-car.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"960\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Abby Deshman\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@MichaelLowry\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Abby Deshman\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/\",\"name\":\"A Victory at the Supreme Court for Evidence-Based Criminal Law - CCLA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/police-car.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-28T20:10:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-01-13T21:30:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b914f44e221f7fa3016a250be048231e\"},\"description\":\"On October 28 the Supreme Court released its decision in R. v. Ndhlovu. The decision is a resounding affirmation of the constitutional protection of individual liberty and the need for criminal law to be based on sound social science evidence \u2014 not speculation and stigma.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/police-car.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/police-car.jpg\",\"width\":960,\"height\":640},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CRIMINAL JUSTICE\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"A Victory at the Supreme Court for Evidence-Based Criminal Law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b914f44e221f7fa3016a250be048231e\",\"name\":\"Abby Deshman\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/21e36870405e983bb15befc55fb192bb?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/21e36870405e983bb15befc55fb192bb?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Abby Deshman\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/x.com\/MichaelLowry\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/abby\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Victory at the Supreme Court for Evidence-Based Criminal Law - CCLA","description":"On October 28 the Supreme Court released its decision in R. v. Ndhlovu. The decision is a resounding affirmation of the constitutional protection of individual liberty and the need for criminal law to be based on sound social science evidence \u2014 not speculation and stigma.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/","og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Victory at the Supreme Court for Evidence-Based Criminal Law - CCLA","og_description":"On October 28 the Supreme Court released its decision in R. v. Ndhlovu. The decision is a resounding affirmation of the constitutional protection of individual liberty and the need for criminal law to be based on sound social science evidence \u2014 not speculation and stigma.","og_url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/","og_site_name":"CCLA","article_published_time":"2022-10-28T20:10:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-01-13T21:30:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":960,"height":640,"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/police-car.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Abby Deshman","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@MichaelLowry","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Abby Deshman","Estimation du temps de lecture":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/","name":"A Victory at the Supreme Court for Evidence-Based Criminal Law - CCLA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/police-car.jpg","datePublished":"2022-10-28T20:10:06+00:00","dateModified":"2023-01-13T21:30:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b914f44e221f7fa3016a250be048231e"},"description":"On October 28 the Supreme Court released its decision in R. v. Ndhlovu. The decision is a resounding affirmation of the constitutional protection of individual liberty and the need for criminal law to be based on sound social science evidence \u2014 not speculation and stigma.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/police-car.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/police-car.jpg","width":960,"height":640},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/a-victory-at-the-supreme-court-for-evidence-based-criminal-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CRIMINAL JUSTICE","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"A Victory at the Supreme Court for Evidence-Based Criminal Law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/","name":"CCLA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b914f44e221f7fa3016a250be048231e","name":"Abby Deshman","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/21e36870405e983bb15befc55fb192bb?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/21e36870405e983bb15befc55fb192bb?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Abby Deshman"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/MichaelLowry"],"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/abby\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8465"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8465\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8466,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8465\/revisions\/8466"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2891"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8465"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8465"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}