{"id":2999,"date":"2017-02-23T14:31:30","date_gmt":"2017-02-23T14:31:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?p=2999"},"modified":"2021-06-14T23:27:29","modified_gmt":"2021-06-14T23:27:29","slug":"drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/proces-equitable-procedure-reguliere-condamnation\/les-avis-des-experts-en-reconnaissance-de-drogues-ne-doivent-pas-etre-consideres-comme-des-preuves-irrefutables\/","title":{"rendered":"Les opinions des experts en reconnaissance des drogues ne doivent pas \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9es comme des preuves irr\u00e9futables"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n

\n

POUR DIFFUSION IMM\u00c9DIATE<\/strong><\/p>\n

TORONTO, Ont. \u0336 L'Association canadienne des libert\u00e9s civiles est d\u00e9\u00e7ue que la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada permette qu'une \u00e9valuation subjective par un expert en reconnaissance des drogues soit utilis\u00e9e comme preuve sans test de sauvegarde.<\/p>\n

En cause devant la CSC en\u00a0R. c. Bingley<\/a><\/em>\u00a0\u00e9tait de savoir si la preuve d'opinion en bordure de route d'un ERD, essentiellement des policiers form\u00e9s pour identifier les personnes sous l'influence de drogues, est admissible comme preuve de culpabilit\u00e9 dans une affaire judiciaire. Ou les conclusions de la DRE devraient-elles passer par un\u00a0Mohan voir dire<\/em>\u00a0ainsi un juge peut \u00e9valuer la qualit\u00e9 de la preuve et les qualifications du DRE avant que sa preuve puisse \u00eatre pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e en audience publique.<\/p>\n

Aujourd'hui, la majorit\u00e9 du tribunal a statu\u00e9 en\u00a0R. c. Bingley\u00a0<\/em>que la formation et l'exp\u00e9rience d'un ERD en font des experts et que, par cons\u00e9quent, leurs opinions n'ont g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement pas besoin d'\u00eatre examin\u00e9es plus avant par un juge avant de pouvoir \u00eatre pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es comme preuves devant un tribunal.<\/p>\n

Les DRE \u00ab\u00a0poss\u00e8de sans aucun doute une expertise pour d\u00e9terminer les facult\u00e9s affaiblies par la drogue qui est en dehors de l'exp\u00e9rience et de la connaissance du juge des faits\u00a0\u00bb, a \u00e9crit la majorit\u00e9 dans une d\u00e9cision 5-2. L'opinion dissidente exprime de s\u00e9rieuses inqui\u00e9tudes quant \u00e0 la fiabilit\u00e9 du processus d'\u00e9valuation du DRE et ne consid\u00e9rerait pas sa fiabilit\u00e9 comme acquise dans des cas individuels.<\/p>\n

La science des facult\u00e9s affaiblies par la drogue ou la marijuana est encore assez floue. Contrairement \u00e0 la conduite en \u00e9tat d'\u00e9bri\u00e9t\u00e9, il n'existe aucune norme scientifique pour d\u00e9terminer si la capacit\u00e9 d'une personne \u00e0 conduire un v\u00e9hicule \u00e0 moteur est affaiblie par une drogue ou une combinaison d'alcool et de drogue.<\/p>\n

L'Association canadienne des libert\u00e9s civiles, qui est intervenue dans l'affaire devant le plus haut tribunal, s'inqui\u00e8te des dangers de se fier sans critique \u00e0 la science nouvelle comme preuve d'expert cl\u00e9 admissible. Nous avons soutenu que l'admissibilit\u00e9 de l'opinion de l'ERD sur la question de savoir si la capacit\u00e9 d'une personne \u00e0 conduire un v\u00e9hicule est affaiblie par une drogue ou une combinaison d'alcool et de drogue ne devrait pas \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme une preuve d'expert sans avoir d'abord fait l'objet d'une \u00e9valuation judiciaire par le biais d'un\u00a0Mohan voir dire<\/em>.<\/p>\n

\u00ab\u00a0Compte tenu de la subjectivit\u00e9 inh\u00e9rente \u00e0 l'opinion d'un expert en reconnaissance de drogues sur la question de savoir si un accus\u00e9 a consomm\u00e9 de la drogue, nous ne devrions pas traiter une opinion subjective comme une preuve irr\u00e9futable. Au lieu de cela, nous devrions utiliser la garantie du voir dire de Mohan qui existe pour cette m\u00eame raison \u2013 la garantie permet une \u00e9valuation de l'admissibilit\u00e9 \u00bb, a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 Sukanya Pillay, directrice ex\u00e9cutive et avocate g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de l'ACLC.<\/p>\n

La majorit\u00e9 a not\u00e9 qu'un juge de premi\u00e8re instance conserve le pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire d'exclure des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve dans une affaire donn\u00e9e, en fonction des types de probl\u00e8mes potentiels que nous avons identifi\u00e9s, y compris l'incapacit\u00e9 d'un ERD individuel d'expliquer comment il a pris sa d\u00e9cision, la preuve de partialit\u00e9, le d\u00e9faut de se conformer avec la formation, et la contradiction de l'avis du DRE par des preuves d'\u00e9chantillons corporels ou m\u00eame les preuves de t\u00e9moins.<\/p>\n

L'avocat de l'affaire repr\u00e9sentant l'ACLC \u00e9tait Stuart Zacharias, associ\u00e9 chez Lerners LLP.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t

\u00c0 propos de l\u2019association canadienne sur les libert\u00e9s civiles<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

L\u2019ACLC est un organisme ind\u00e9pendant \u00e0 but non lucratif qui compte des sympathisant.e.s dans tout le pays. Fond\u00e9 en 1964, c\u2019est un organisme qui \u0153uvre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle du Canada \u00e0 la protection des droits et des libert\u00e9s civiles de toute sa population.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les m\u00e9dias<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Pour d'autres commentaires, veuillez nous contacter \u00e0\u00a0media@ccla.org<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les mises \u00e0 jour en direct<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Veuillez continuer \u00e0 vous r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0\u00a0cette page<\/a>\u00a0et \u00e0 nos plateformes de m\u00e9dias sociaux. On est dessus\u00a0Instagram<\/u><\/a>,\u00a0Facebook<\/u><\/a>, Twitter<\/u><\/a> et Ciel bleu<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L'Association canadienne des libert\u00e9s civiles (ACLC) contestera l'injonction exceptionnellement large du gouvernement de la Nouvelle-\u00c9cosse limitant les manifestations dans la province.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":1351,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,124,83],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2999","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-criminal-justice","8":"category-fair-trial-rights","9":"category-fair-trial-due-process-sentencing"},"yoast_head":"\nDrug Recognition Expert\u2019s Opinions Shouldn\u2019t Be Taken As Incontrovertible Evidence - CCLA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/proces-equitable-procedure-reguliere-condamnation\/les-avis-des-experts-en-reconnaissance-de-drogues-ne-doivent-pas-etre-consideres-comme-des-preuves-irrefutables\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Drug Recognition Expert\u2019s Opinions Shouldn\u2019t Be Taken As Incontrovertible Evidence - CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA)\u00a0will challenge the Government of Nova Scotia\u2019s\u00a0exceptionally broad injunction limiting protests in the province.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/proces-equitable-procedure-reguliere-condamnation\/les-avis-des-experts-en-reconnaissance-de-drogues-ne-doivent-pas-etre-consideres-comme-des-preuves-irrefutables\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-23T14:31:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-14T23:27:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/\",\"name\":\"Drug Recognition Expert\u2019s Opinions Shouldn\u2019t Be Taken As Incontrovertible Evidence - CCLA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-23T14:31:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-14T23:27:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CRIMINAL JUSTICE\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Fair Trial, Due Process & Sentencing\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Drug Recognition Expert\u2019s Opinions Shouldn\u2019t Be Taken As Incontrovertible Evidence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"CCLA\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/ccla\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Drug Recognition Expert\u2019s Opinions Shouldn\u2019t Be Taken As Incontrovertible Evidence - CCLA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/proces-equitable-procedure-reguliere-condamnation\/les-avis-des-experts-en-reconnaissance-de-drogues-ne-doivent-pas-etre-consideres-comme-des-preuves-irrefutables\/","og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Drug Recognition Expert\u2019s Opinions Shouldn\u2019t Be Taken As Incontrovertible Evidence - CCLA","og_description":"The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA)\u00a0will challenge the Government of Nova Scotia\u2019s\u00a0exceptionally broad injunction limiting protests in the province.","og_url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/proces-equitable-procedure-reguliere-condamnation\/les-avis-des-experts-en-reconnaissance-de-drogues-ne-doivent-pas-etre-consideres-comme-des-preuves-irrefutables\/","og_site_name":"CCLA","article_published_time":"2017-02-23T14:31:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-14T23:27:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"CCLA","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"CCLA","Estimation du temps de lecture":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/","name":"Drug Recognition Expert\u2019s Opinions Shouldn\u2019t Be Taken As Incontrovertible Evidence - CCLA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg","datePublished":"2017-02-23T14:31:30+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-14T23:27:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg","width":2000,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/drug-recognition-experts-opinions-shouldnt-be-taken-as-incontrovertible-evidence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CRIMINAL JUSTICE","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Fair Trial, Due Process & Sentencing","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Drug Recognition Expert\u2019s Opinions Shouldn\u2019t Be Taken As Incontrovertible Evidence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/","name":"CCLA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d","name":"CCLA","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"CCLA"},"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/ccla\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2999"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2999\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3345,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2999\/revisions\/3345"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1351"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}