{"id":2978,"date":"2017-03-22T13:44:02","date_gmt":"2017-03-22T13:44:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?p=2978"},"modified":"2021-06-13T13:47:54","modified_gmt":"2021-06-13T13:47:54","slug":"vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/libertes-fondamentales\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/","title":{"rendered":"La d\u00e9cision de Vice Media soul\u00e8ve de s\u00e9rieuses questions sur la libert\u00e9 de la presse"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n

\n
\n

POUR DIFFUSION IMM\u00c9DIATE<\/strong><\/p>\n

TORONTO \u0336 Dans une d\u00e9cision rendue aujourd'hui qui soul\u00e8ve de s\u00e9rieuses questions sur la capacit\u00e9 des journalistes \u00e0 prot\u00e9ger leurs sources et \u00e0 mettre en lumi\u00e8re des histoires importantes, la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario a refus\u00e9 d'annuler l'ordonnance obligeant le journaliste de Vice Media Ben Makuch \u00e0 fournir \u00e0 la GRC ses documents de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence.<\/p>\n

\u00ab La protection des sources est la pierre angulaire d'une presse libre, et une presse libre est la pierre angulaire d'une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 libre \u00bb, a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 Sukanya Pillay, directrice g\u00e9n\u00e9rale et avocate g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de l'Association canadienne des libert\u00e9s civiles.<\/p>\n

L'affaire s'est produite lorsque Makuch a \u00e9t\u00e9 contraint de produire ses communications avec Ben Shirdon et de les remettre \u00e0 la police. Les communications d\u00e9coulent d'une histoire que Makuch a \u00e9crite en 2014 \u00e0 propos de Shirdon rejoignant le groupe terroriste se faisant appeler ISIS.<\/p>\n

R. c Vice Media Canada Inc.<\/i><\/a>, a examin\u00e9 si et quand un journaliste peut \u00eatre contraint de r\u00e9v\u00e9ler des communications avec une source journalistique dans le but d'aider une enqu\u00eate polici\u00e8re. Il a \u00e9galement examin\u00e9 la question d'une interdiction de publication qui emp\u00eacherait davantage le public d'acc\u00e9der aux informations sur lesquelles la police s'est appuy\u00e9e pour obtenir les d\u00e9cisions de justice. Le juge qui a accord\u00e9 l'ordonnance de production a \u00e9galement rendu une ordonnance de mise sous scell\u00e9s concernant tous les documents de l'ordonnance de production, y compris l'affidavit \u00e0 l'appui d\u00e9pos\u00e9 par l'agent de police. En plus de cela, le juge a interdit la publication de toute partie non expurg\u00e9e du document. L'ACLC a fait valoir qu'une interdiction de publication est un substitut inappropri\u00e9 \u00e0 une ordonnance de mise sous scell\u00e9s, lorsque les informations interdites sont d\u00e9j\u00e0 accessibles au public, et en outre, est incompatible avec le principe de la publicit\u00e9 des d\u00e9bats et la libert\u00e9 d'expression.<\/p>\n

L'ACLC a \u00e9galement soutenu qu'une \u00ab information \u00e0 obtenir \u00bb doit \u00eatre rendue publique lorsque la preuve est insuffisante pour justifier une ordonnance de mise sous scell\u00e9s et lorsque les motifs d'une ordonnance de mise sous scell\u00e9s ne sont pas suffisamment d\u00e9taill\u00e9s pour permettre un examen en appel significatif.<\/p>\n

L'ACLC est d'accord avec la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario qui a reconnu que certaines parties de l'interdiction de publication \u00e9taient inutiles et que ces parties de l'interdiction de publication devraient \u00eatre r\u00e9examin\u00e9es.<\/p>\n

Bien que la Cour ait confirm\u00e9 l'interdiction de publication dans cette affaire, la Cour a not\u00e9 \u00e0 juste titre que plusieurs parties de l'ordonnance sont d\u00e9j\u00e0 dans le domaine public et peuvent avoir fait l'objet d'une interdiction de publication de mani\u00e8re inappropri\u00e9e. Par cons\u00e9quent, la Cour a donn\u00e9 aux parties la possibilit\u00e9 de modifier l'ordonnance par entente ou par une demande future en Cour sup\u00e9rieure.<\/p>\n

L'ACLC demeure toutefois pr\u00e9occup\u00e9e par l'impact que cette d\u00e9cision aura sur la libert\u00e9 de la presse au Canada, en particulier dans le climat contemporain. Par exemple, alors que nous nous f\u00e9licitons de la r\u00e9cente d\u00e9cision du Qu\u00e9bec de cr\u00e9er un\u00a0Commission d'enqu\u00eate sur la protection de la confidentialit\u00e9 des sources journalistiques<\/i>, les nombreux rapports de surveillance polici\u00e8re de journalistes au Qu\u00e9bec qui ont donn\u00e9 lieu \u00e0 la Commission rappellent que le Canada fait encore face \u00e0 des d\u00e9fis importants dans ses efforts pour prot\u00e9ger une presse libre et ind\u00e9pendante.<\/p>\n

Bien que des intrusions dans la relation journaliste-source puissent dans certaines circonstances \u00eatre justifi\u00e9es, l'Association canadienne des libert\u00e9s civiles croit que ce cas n'\u00e9tait pas un tel cas. L'ACLC surveillera l'impact de ce jugement sur la libert\u00e9 de la presse au Canada.<\/p>\n

Une presse libre joue un r\u00f4le vital dans l'autonomie d\u00e9mocratique. Les mesures polici\u00e8res ou judiciaires qui peuvent avoir pour effet de paralyser les journalistes dans leurs tentatives de recueillir des informations peuvent paralyser ce r\u00f4le d\u00e9mocratique essentiel. L'ACLC estime qu'il est dans l'int\u00e9r\u00eat public que la presse puisse communiquer avec les sources afin de permettre des reportages et des commentaires opportuns et significatifs sur les institutions et les \u00e9v\u00e9nements publics - sans crainte d'ing\u00e9rence du gouvernement. Les ordonnances judiciaires qui obligent les journalistes \u00e0 divulguer les communications avec leurs sources, et qui restreignent l'acc\u00e8s aux informations justifiant ces ordonnances judiciaires, peuvent menacer l'int\u00e9grit\u00e9 de la relation entre les journalistes et leurs sources.<\/p>\n

Les avocats de l'ACLC dans l'intervention \u00e0 l'ONCA \u00e9taient Brian Radnoff et Christopher Shorey de Lerners LLP.<\/p>\n

Contacts:<\/b><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Rob De Luca, avocat salari\u00e9
\n416-363-0321 X229
\nRDeluca@ccla.org<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t

\u00c0 propos de l\u2019association canadienne sur les libert\u00e9s civiles<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

L\u2019ACLC est un organisme ind\u00e9pendant \u00e0 but non lucratif qui compte des sympathisant.e.s dans tout le pays. Fond\u00e9 en 1964, c\u2019est un organisme qui \u0153uvre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle du Canada \u00e0 la protection des droits et des libert\u00e9s civiles de toute sa population.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les m\u00e9dias<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Pour d'autres commentaires, veuillez nous contacter \u00e0\u00a0media@ccla.org<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les mises \u00e0 jour en direct<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Veuillez continuer \u00e0 vous r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0\u00a0cette page<\/a>\u00a0et \u00e0 nos plateformes de m\u00e9dias sociaux. On est dessus\u00a0Instagram<\/u><\/a>,\u00a0Facebook<\/u><\/a>, Twitter<\/u><\/a> et Ciel bleu<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

TORONTO \u0336 Dans une d\u00e9cision rendue aujourd'hui qui soul\u00e8ve de s\u00e9rieuses questions sur la capacit\u00e9 des journalistes \u00e0 prot\u00e9ger leurs sources et \u00e0 mettre en lumi\u00e8re des histoires importantes, la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario a refus\u00e9 d'annuler l'ordonnance obligeant le journaliste de Vice Media Ben Makuch \u00e0 fournir \u00e0 la GRC ses documents de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":2977,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[74,31,165],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2978","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-freedoms-expression","8":"category-fundamental-freedoms","9":"category-internet-privacy-and-speech"},"yoast_head":"\nVice Media Ruling Raises Serious Questions About Press Freedoms - CCLA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/libertes-fondamentales\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vice Media Ruling Raises Serious Questions About Press Freedoms - CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"TORONTO \u0336 In a ruling today that raises serious questions about reporters\u2019 ability to protect their sources and bring important stories to light, the Ontario Court of Appeal refused to quash the order compelling Vice Media reporter Ben Makuch to provide the RCMP with his background materials.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/libertes-fondamentales\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-03-22T13:44:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-13T13:47:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/iStock_000046155504_Large.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"300\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"225\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/\",\"name\":\"Vice Media Ruling Raises Serious Questions About Press Freedoms - CCLA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/iStock_000046155504_Large.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-03-22T13:44:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-13T13:47:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/iStock_000046155504_Large.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/iStock_000046155504_Large.jpg\",\"width\":300,\"height\":225},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/fundamental-freedoms\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Freedom of Expression\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/fundamental-freedoms\/freedoms-expression\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Vice Media Ruling Raises Serious Questions About Press Freedoms\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"CCLA\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/ccla\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vice Media Ruling Raises Serious Questions About Press Freedoms - CCLA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/libertes-fondamentales\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/","og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vice Media Ruling Raises Serious Questions About Press Freedoms - CCLA","og_description":"TORONTO \u0336 In a ruling today that raises serious questions about reporters\u2019 ability to protect their sources and bring important stories to light, the Ontario Court of Appeal refused to quash the order compelling Vice Media reporter Ben Makuch to provide the RCMP with his background materials.","og_url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/libertes-fondamentales\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/","og_site_name":"CCLA","article_published_time":"2017-03-22T13:44:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-13T13:47:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":300,"height":225,"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/iStock_000046155504_Large.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"CCLA","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"CCLA","Estimation du temps de lecture":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/","name":"Vice Media Ruling Raises Serious Questions About Press Freedoms - CCLA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/iStock_000046155504_Large.jpg","datePublished":"2017-03-22T13:44:02+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-13T13:47:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/iStock_000046155504_Large.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/iStock_000046155504_Large.jpg","width":300,"height":225},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/fundamental-freedoms\/vice-media-ruling-raises-serious-questions-about-press-freedoms\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/fundamental-freedoms\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Freedom of Expression","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/fundamental-freedoms\/freedoms-expression\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Vice Media Ruling Raises Serious Questions About Press Freedoms"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/","name":"CCLA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d","name":"CCLA","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"CCLA"},"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/ccla\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2978"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2978\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2979,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2978\/revisions\/2979"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2977"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}