{"id":2760,"date":"2018-04-03T00:35:16","date_gmt":"2018-04-03T00:35:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?p=2760"},"modified":"2021-06-13T00:39:58","modified_gmt":"2021-06-13T00:39:58","slug":"federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/non-classe\/la-cour-dappel-federale-a-place-la-barre-tres-bas-en-matiere-de-signalement-des-problemes-lies-aux-chartes\/","title":{"rendered":"La Cour d'appel f\u00e9d\u00e9rale a fix\u00e9 une barre extr\u00eamement basse pour signaler les probl\u00e8mes li\u00e9s \u00e0 la Charte"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n

\n

Le 20 mars 2018, plus d'un an apr\u00e8s avoir entendu les plaidoiries en mati\u00e8re de\u00a0Schmidt c. Procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral du Canada,\u00a0<\/em>la Cour d'appel f\u00e9d\u00e9rale a rendu sa d\u00e9cision. La d\u00e9cision affirme que le\u00a0<\/em>Le ministre de la Justice n'a \u00e0 faire rapport au Parlement que sur les incoh\u00e9rences entre un projet de loi et le\u00a0Charte des droits et libert\u00e9s<\/em>\u00a0lorsqu'il n'y a aucun argument cr\u00e9dible en faveur de l'adoption du projet de loi\u00a0chartes<\/em>\u00a0test. Ce faible niveau pourrait expliquer pourquoi, au cours des 35 ann\u00e9es qui se sont \u00e9coul\u00e9es depuis l'av\u00e8nement du\u00a0chartes<\/em>, pas un seul rapport n'a \u00e9t\u00e9 fait.<\/p>\n

L'ACLC est intervenue dans\u00a0Schmidt<\/em>, tant \u00e0 la Cour f\u00e9d\u00e9rale qu'\u00e0 la Cour d'appel f\u00e9d\u00e9rale, parce que nous croyons que le devoir de rapport du ministre de la Justice devrait viser \u00e0 informer le Parlement, et les Canadiens ordinaires, de la mesure dans laquelle les projets de loi sont conformes aux\u00a0chartes<\/em>. La r\u00e8gle du constitutionnalisme dicte que le gouvernement a le devoir de r\u00e9diger une loi qui respecte les\u00a0chartes<\/em>. Selon la l\u00e9gislation en cause en l'esp\u00e8ce, le ministre est tenu de faire rapport lorsque la l\u00e9gislation propos\u00e9e ne le fait pas.<\/p>\n

Le procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral a fait valoir que le devoir de rapport de la ministre de la Justice a une fonction dissuasive et n'est exerc\u00e9 qu'en dernier recours : si la ministre n'a pas confiance dans le projet de loi qu'elle est tenue de d\u00e9poser, elle doit en faire rapport au Parlement, et puis d\u00e9missionner. Selon cette th\u00e9orie, le v\u00e9ritable contr\u00f4le a lieu avant le d\u00e9p\u00f4t du projet de loi par le ministre.<\/p>\n

La d\u00e9cision de la Cour d'appel f\u00e9d\u00e9rale est fond\u00e9e sur la d\u00e9termination que l'interpr\u00e9tation actuelle des dispositions est non seulement raisonnable, mais correcte. La Cour va aussi jusqu'\u00e0 un certain point pour expliquer la complexit\u00e9 de d\u00e9terminer si la l\u00e9gislation est\u00a0chartes<\/em>-conforme, sugg\u00e9rant que puisqu'il ne sera g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement pas possible de dire avec certitude que la l\u00e9gislation est conforme \u00e0 la\u00a0chartes<\/em>, la norme doit \u00eatre comprise comme une obligation de d\u00e9claration lorsqu'il n'y a aucun argument \u00e0 l'appui de la conformit\u00e9.<\/p>\n

L'ACLC est d\u00e9\u00e7ue de la d\u00e9cision de la Cour et continue de croire au besoin d'une r\u00e9forme qui permettra aux parlementaires d'\u00eatre en mesure d'\u00e9valuer v\u00e9ritablement et de mani\u00e8re significative les implications constitutionnelles des lois qu'ils adoptent. Bien que le gouvernement ait propos\u00e9 un amendement \u00e0 la\u00a0Loi sur le minist\u00e8re de la Justice\u00a0<\/em>qui obligerait le ministre \u00e0 d\u00e9livrer un\u00a0chartes<\/em>\u00a0d\u00e9claration concernant tous les projets de loi d\u00e9pos\u00e9s au Parlement, nous demeurons pr\u00e9occup\u00e9s par le fait que l'amendement ne va pas assez loin. Cela permettrait une d\u00e9claration relativement superficielle sur\u00a0chartes\u00a0<\/em>conformit\u00e9 plut\u00f4t que de pr\u00e9senter au Parlement le genre d'analyse d\u00e9taill\u00e9e qui est n\u00e9cessaire pour d\u00e9fendre la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de la l\u00e9gislation devant nos tribunaux. Pour plus d'informations sur les propositions de l'ACLC visant \u00e0 am\u00e9liorer notre syst\u00e8me actuel d'examen l\u00e9gislatif, voir\u00a0www.ccla.org\/charterfirst<\/a>.<\/p>\n

M\u00e9moire de la Cour d'appel f\u00e9d\u00e9rale<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0(conjointement avec BCCLA)<\/p>\n

D\u00e9cision de la Cour d'appel f\u00e9d\u00e9rale<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

L'ACLC dans l'actualit\u00e9 :<\/p>\n

Avocats au quotidien\u00a0:\u00a0L'ancien avocat de la justice f\u00e9d\u00e9rale Schmidt accuse le d\u00e9partement de "double langage" apr\u00e8s avoir perdu l'appel<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t

\u00c0 propos de l\u2019association canadienne sur les libert\u00e9s civiles<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

L\u2019ACLC est un organisme ind\u00e9pendant \u00e0 but non lucratif qui compte des sympathisant.e.s dans tout le pays. Fond\u00e9 en 1964, c\u2019est un organisme qui \u0153uvre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle du Canada \u00e0 la protection des droits et des libert\u00e9s civiles de toute sa population.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les m\u00e9dias<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Pour d'autres commentaires, veuillez nous contacter \u00e0\u00a0media@ccla.org<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les mises \u00e0 jour en direct<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Veuillez continuer \u00e0 vous r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0\u00a0cette page<\/a>\u00a0et \u00e0 nos plateformes de m\u00e9dias sociaux. On est dessus\u00a0Instagram<\/u><\/a>,\u00a0Facebook<\/u><\/a>, Twitter<\/u><\/a> et Ciel bleu<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le 20 mars 2018, plus d'un an apr\u00e8s avoir entendu les arguments dans l'affaire Schmidt c. Procureur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral du Canada, la Cour d'appel f\u00e9d\u00e9rale a rendu sa d\u00e9cision. La d\u00e9cision affirme que le ministre de la Justice n'a \u00e0 faire rapport au Parlement sur les incoh\u00e9rences entre un projet de loi et la Charte des droits et libert\u00e9s que lorsqu'il n'y a aucun argument cr\u00e9dible en faveur du projet de loi qui passe le test de la Charte. <\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":1351,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2760","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-uncategorized"},"yoast_head":"\nFederal Court of Appeal Set a Disturbingly Low Bar for Reporting Charter Problems - CCLA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/non-classe\/la-cour-dappel-federale-a-place-la-barre-tres-bas-en-matiere-de-signalement-des-problemes-lies-aux-chartes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Federal Court of Appeal Set a Disturbingly Low Bar for Reporting Charter Problems - CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On March 20, 2018, more than a year after hearing arguments in the matter of Schmidt v. Attorney General of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision. The ruling affirms that the Minister of Justice only has to report to Parliament regarding inconsistencies between a proposed bill and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms when there is no credible argument in favour of the bill passing the Charter test.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/non-classe\/la-cour-dappel-federale-a-place-la-barre-tres-bas-en-matiere-de-signalement-des-problemes-lies-aux-chartes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-04-03T00:35:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-13T00:39:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/\",\"name\":\"Federal Court of Appeal Set a Disturbingly Low Bar for Reporting Charter Problems - CCLA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-04-03T00:35:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-13T00:39:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Uncategorized\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/uncategorized\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Federal Court of Appeal Set a Disturbingly Low Bar for Reporting Charter Problems\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"CCLA\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/ccla\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Federal Court of Appeal Set a Disturbingly Low Bar for Reporting Charter Problems - CCLA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/non-classe\/la-cour-dappel-federale-a-place-la-barre-tres-bas-en-matiere-de-signalement-des-problemes-lies-aux-chartes\/","og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Federal Court of Appeal Set a Disturbingly Low Bar for Reporting Charter Problems - CCLA","og_description":"On March 20, 2018, more than a year after hearing arguments in the matter of Schmidt v. Attorney General of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision. The ruling affirms that the Minister of Justice only has to report to Parliament regarding inconsistencies between a proposed bill and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms when there is no credible argument in favour of the bill passing the Charter test.","og_url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/non-classe\/la-cour-dappel-federale-a-place-la-barre-tres-bas-en-matiere-de-signalement-des-problemes-lies-aux-chartes\/","og_site_name":"CCLA","article_published_time":"2018-04-03T00:35:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-13T00:39:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"CCLA","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"CCLA","Estimation du temps de lecture":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/","name":"Federal Court of Appeal Set a Disturbingly Low Bar for Reporting Charter Problems - CCLA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg","datePublished":"2018-04-03T00:35:16+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-13T00:39:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/CCCL_general_crowd_2000x800.jpg","width":2000,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/uncategorized\/federal-court-of-appeal-set-a-disturbingly-low-bar-for-reporting-charter-problems\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Uncategorized","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/uncategorized\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Federal Court of Appeal Set a Disturbingly Low Bar for Reporting Charter Problems"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/","name":"CCLA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d","name":"CCLA","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"CCLA"},"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/ccla\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2760","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2760"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2760\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2762,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2760\/revisions\/2762"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1351"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2760"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2760"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2760"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}