{"id":2562,"date":"2018-12-13T17:25:14","date_gmt":"2018-12-13T17:25:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?p=2562"},"modified":"2021-09-22T18:33:30","modified_gmt":"2021-09-22T18:33:30","slug":"supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/intimite\/recherche-saisie\/la-cour-supreme-estime-quil-existe-une-attente-raisonnable-de-respect-de-la-vie-privee-dans-un-ordinateur-partage\/","title":{"rendered":"La Cour supr\u00eame constate une attente raisonnable en mati\u00e8re de confidentialit\u00e9 dans l'ordinateur partag\u00e9"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Dans une d\u00e9cision rendue aujourd'hui en\u00a0R contre Reeves<\/em>, la Cour supr\u00eame a statu\u00e9 que chaque Canadien a une attente raisonnable en mati\u00e8re de confidentialit\u00e9 de son ordinateur, m\u00eame s'il le partage avec d'autres, en vertu de l'article 8 de la\u00a0chartes<\/i>. Cette d\u00e9cision est une grande victoire pour le droit \u00e0 la vie priv\u00e9e des citoyens. Il \u00e9largit la protection des ordinateurs personnels sous la\u00a0Vu\u00a0<\/i>cadre en exigeant un mandat pour perquisitionner un ordinateur m\u00eame si le copropri\u00e9taire avec propri\u00e9t\u00e9 et contr\u00f4le partag\u00e9s a consenti \u00e0 la perquisition.<\/p>\n

L'affaire concernait de la pornographie juv\u00e9nile trouv\u00e9e sur un ordinateur personnel partag\u00e9 entre l'accus\u00e9, Thomas Reeves, et son \u00e9pouse. Son \u00e9pouse a consenti \u00e0 ce que la police entre dans la maison et prenne l'ordinateur de l'espace partag\u00e9. L'officier \u00e0 ce moment n'avait pas de mandat. \u00c0 la Cour supr\u00eame, la question cl\u00e9 \u00e9tait de savoir si le policier pouvait s'appuyer sur le consentement de l'\u00e9pouse de Reeves pour prendre l'ordinateur partag\u00e9 de leur domicile.<\/p>\n

Le juge de l'audience initiale a conclu que la police avait enfreint les\u00a0chartes\u00a0<\/i>droits et exclu la preuve de pornographie juv\u00e9nile en vertu du paragraphe 24(2), ce qui a entra\u00een\u00e9 un acquittement. La Cour d'appel a infirm\u00e9 cette d\u00e9cision, autorisant la preuve et ordonnant un nouveau proc\u00e8s. La Cour supr\u00eame s'est rang\u00e9e du c\u00f4t\u00e9 du juge d'audience, excluant les preuves et r\u00e9tablissant l'acquittement.<\/p>\n

Depuis l'aube de l'\u00e8re num\u00e9rique, la Cour supr\u00eame fait du rattrapage pour appliquer l'article 8 aux perquisitions et saisies d'ordinateurs et de t\u00e9l\u00e9phones cellulaires. Ces appareils contiennent des tr\u00e9sors d'informations sensibles que nous souhaitons cacher aux regards indiscrets de l'\u00c9tat. Dans\u00a0R contre Vu<\/i>, Cromwell J a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 que \u00ab\u00a0les int\u00e9r\u00eats en mati\u00e8re de vie priv\u00e9e impliqu\u00e9s par les fouilles informatiques sont nettement diff\u00e9rents de ceux en jeu dans les fouilles de r\u00e9cipients tels que les armoires et les classeurs\u00a0\u00bb. Poster-Vu<\/i>, les agents des forces de l'ordre ont d\u00e9sormais besoin d'une autorisation judiciaire pr\u00e9alable (telle qu'un mandat de perquisition) pour saisir et fouiller un ordinateur personnel.<\/p>\n

Reeves<\/i>\u00a0peut \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme une extension de\u00a0Vu<\/i>, en ce qu'il accorde cette protection non seulement \u00e0 l'ordinateur du demandeur, mais \u00e9galement \u00e0 un ordinateur dont l'usage est partag\u00e9. La d\u00e9cision est \u00e9galement \u00e9clair\u00e9e par\u00a0Maraka<\/i>, qui a constat\u00e9 qu'une perte involontaire de contr\u00f4le de l'appareil n'\u00e9limine pas l'attente d'une personne en mati\u00e8re de vie priv\u00e9e. Reeves \u00e9tait en garde \u00e0 vue et incapable d'entrer chez lui au moment o\u00f9 les enqu\u00eateurs ont saisi son ordinateur.<\/p>\n

Alors que la condamnation de Reeves portait sur la seule question de la saisie de son ordinateur, une autre question soulev\u00e9e dans cet appel concernait l'entr\u00e9e de la police dans une r\u00e9sidence partag\u00e9e par M. Reeves et son \u00e9pouse. Bien que la majorit\u00e9 ait refus\u00e9 d'aborder cette question ici, le juge Moldaver et le juge C\u00f4t\u00e9 ont exprim\u00e9 des opinions divergentes sur le moment appropri\u00e9 pour les policiers d'entrer et de fouiller les aires communes d'une r\u00e9sidence lorsqu'un seul r\u00e9sident d'un logement partag\u00e9 y donne son consentement.<\/p>\n

Cette question devrait \u00eatre trait\u00e9e dans\u00a0R v Le<\/i>\u00a0\u2013 une d\u00e9cision \u00e0 venir dans laquelle l'ACLC est intervenante. Nous avons aussi r\u00e9cemment comparu devant la Cour supr\u00eame dans\u00a0R contre Mills<\/i>, luttant pour le droit \u00e0 la vie priv\u00e9e des citoyens canadiens lors de conversations \u00e9lectroniques individuelles. L'ACLC attend avec impatience la d\u00e9cision du tribunal dans ces deux jugements alors que nous continuons de lutter pour la protection de la vie priv\u00e9e des Canadiens dans les espaces physiques et num\u00e9riques.<\/p>\n

Teddy Weinstein
\nStagiaire
\ntweinstein@ccla.org<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t

\u00c0 propos de l\u2019association canadienne sur les libert\u00e9s civiles<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

L\u2019ACLC est un organisme ind\u00e9pendant \u00e0 but non lucratif qui compte des sympathisant.e.s dans tout le pays. Fond\u00e9 en 1964, c\u2019est un organisme qui \u0153uvre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle du Canada \u00e0 la protection des droits et des libert\u00e9s civiles de toute sa population.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les m\u00e9dias<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Pour d'autres commentaires, veuillez nous contacter \u00e0\u00a0media@ccla.org<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les mises \u00e0 jour en direct<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Veuillez continuer \u00e0 vous r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0\u00a0cette page<\/a>\u00a0et \u00e0 nos plateformes de m\u00e9dias sociaux. On est dessus\u00a0Instagram<\/u><\/a>,\u00a0Facebook<\/u><\/a>, Twitter<\/u><\/a> et Ciel bleu<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dans une d\u00e9cision rendue aujourd'hui dans R c Reeves, la Cour supr\u00eame a statu\u00e9 que chaque Canadien a une attente raisonnable en mati\u00e8re de confidentialit\u00e9 dans son ordinateur, m\u00eame s'il le partage avec d'autres, en vertu de l'article 8 de la Charte. Cette d\u00e9cision est une grande victoire pour le droit \u00e0 la vie priv\u00e9e des citoyens.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":1884,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[153,11,89],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2562","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-device-searches","8":"category-privacy","9":"category-search-seizure"},"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Finds a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Shared Computer - CCLA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/intimite\/recherche-saisie\/la-cour-supreme-estime-quil-existe-une-attente-raisonnable-de-respect-de-la-vie-privee-dans-un-ordinateur-partage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Finds a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Shared Computer - CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a decision released today in\u00a0R v Reeves, the Supreme Court ruled that each Canadian has a reasonable expectation of privacy in their computer, even if they share it with others, under section 8 of the\u00a0Charter. This decision is a great victory for citizens\u2019 privacy rights.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/intimite\/recherche-saisie\/la-cour-supreme-estime-quil-existe-une-attente-raisonnable-de-respect-de-la-vie-privee-dans-un-ordinateur-partage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-13T17:25:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-09-22T18:33:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/lock-and-key-as-symbol-for-privacy-and-general-dat-UBY5C3H.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Finds a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Shared Computer - CCLA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/lock-and-key-as-symbol-for-privacy-and-general-dat-UBY5C3H.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-13T17:25:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-09-22T18:33:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/lock-and-key-as-symbol-for-privacy-and-general-dat-UBY5C3H.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/lock-and-key-as-symbol-for-privacy-and-general-dat-UBY5C3H.jpg\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"PRIVACY\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/privacy\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Search & Seizure\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/privacy\/search-seizure\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Finds a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Shared Computer\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"CCLA\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/ccla\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Finds a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Shared Computer - CCLA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/intimite\/recherche-saisie\/la-cour-supreme-estime-quil-existe-une-attente-raisonnable-de-respect-de-la-vie-privee-dans-un-ordinateur-partage\/","og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Finds a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Shared Computer - CCLA","og_description":"In a decision released today in\u00a0R v Reeves, the Supreme Court ruled that each Canadian has a reasonable expectation of privacy in their computer, even if they share it with others, under section 8 of the\u00a0Charter. This decision is a great victory for citizens\u2019 privacy rights.","og_url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/intimite\/recherche-saisie\/la-cour-supreme-estime-quil-existe-une-attente-raisonnable-de-respect-de-la-vie-privee-dans-un-ordinateur-partage\/","og_site_name":"CCLA","article_published_time":"2018-12-13T17:25:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-09-22T18:33:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/lock-and-key-as-symbol-for-privacy-and-general-dat-UBY5C3H.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"CCLA","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"CCLA","Estimation du temps de lecture":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/","name":"Supreme Court Finds a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Shared Computer - CCLA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/lock-and-key-as-symbol-for-privacy-and-general-dat-UBY5C3H.jpg","datePublished":"2018-12-13T17:25:14+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-22T18:33:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/lock-and-key-as-symbol-for-privacy-and-general-dat-UBY5C3H.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/lock-and-key-as-symbol-for-privacy-and-general-dat-UBY5C3H.jpg","width":2000,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/privacy\/search-seizure\/supreme-court-finds-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-shared-computer\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"PRIVACY","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/privacy\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Search & Seizure","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/privacy\/search-seizure\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Supreme Court Finds a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Shared Computer"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/","name":"CCLA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8340210ad747e50e21e040b101a55d8d","name":"CCLA","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b870059ce8f35a3967c509e5d35c55a?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"CCLA"},"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/ccla\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2562"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2562\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6527,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2562\/revisions\/6527"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1884"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}