{"id":2419,"date":"2019-03-29T07:45:10","date_gmt":"2019-03-29T07:45:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?p=2419"},"modified":"2021-09-22T14:58:28","modified_gmt":"2021-09-22T14:58:28","slug":"ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/proces-equitable-procedure-reguliere-condamnation\/la-ccla-a-la-cour-supreme-une-decision-capitale-pour-le-controle-automatique-de-la-detention\/","title":{"rendered":"L'ACLC \u00e0 la Cour supr\u00eame\u00a0: une d\u00e9cision de mise en libert\u00e9 sous caution importante pour les r\u00e9visions automatiques de la d\u00e9tention"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Dans R. c. Myers, la Cour supr\u00eame a \u00e9t\u00e9 charg\u00e9e d'interpr\u00e9ter une disposition quelque peu obscure du Code criminel traitant de l'examen de la d\u00e9tention provisoire. L'affaire a jusqu'\u00e0 pr\u00e9sent re\u00e7u peu d'attention dans la presse ou dans la communaut\u00e9 juridique. Et pourtant, dans sa d\u00e9cision unanime se rangeant du c\u00f4t\u00e9 de l'ACLC, la Cour supr\u00eame pourrait bien avoir lib\u00e9r\u00e9 un nouveau Jordan, bouleversant profond\u00e9ment le syst\u00e8me de lib\u00e9ration sous caution. Et heureusement, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 l'\u00e9tat lamentable de la d\u00e9tention provisoire \u00e0 travers le pays.<\/p>\n

Myers pr\u00e9cise comment interpr\u00e9ter correctement l'art. 525 du Code criminel, une disposition qui donne aux accus\u00e9s d\u00e9tenus dans l'attente de leur proc\u00e8s un r\u00e9examen automatique de leur d\u00e9tention apr\u00e8s 90 jours. La disposition a \u00e9t\u00e9 appliqu\u00e9e de mani\u00e8re incoh\u00e9rente dans tout le pays. Dans la plupart des provinces, l'\u00ab examen de la lib\u00e9ration sous caution de 90 jours \u00bb a g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement pris la forme d'un enregistrement superficiel aupr\u00e8s du tribunal, ou n'a m\u00eame pas eu lieu du tout sur la base d'une interpr\u00e9tation de la disposition exigeant de la personne d\u00e9tenue qu'elle d\u00e9montre d'abord que le le d\u00e9lai pour arriver au proc\u00e8s \u00e9tait d\u00e9raisonnable. La Cour supr\u00eame a \u00e9t\u00e9 invit\u00e9e \u00e0 adopter une telle approche en \u00ab\u00a0deux \u00e9tapes\u00a0\u00bb, en imposant un seuil de responsabilit\u00e9 \u00e0 l'accus\u00e9. Il l'a rejet\u00e9.<\/p>\n

L'ACLC a soutenu qu'aucun seuil pr\u00e9liminaire n'avait besoin d'\u00eatre atteint avant d'examiner si la d\u00e9tention d'une personne restait justifi\u00e9e. Le Parlement avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 fix\u00e9 ce seuil en termes expr\u00e8s : 90 jours. Nous avons fait valoir que la question \u00e0 laquelle le tribunal devait r\u00e9pondre sur une demande fond\u00e9e sur l'art. 525 \u00e9tait de savoir si, apr\u00e8s avoir d\u00e9tenu une personne pr\u00e9sum\u00e9e innocente pendant trois mois dans un \u00e9tablissement p\u00e9nitentiaire, nous \u00e9tions toujours fond\u00e9s \u00e0 priver de libert\u00e9 ? L'ACLC a soutenu que l'art. 525 faisait partie de la solution du Parlement au probl\u00e8me des plaidoyers de culpabilit\u00e9 provoqu\u00e9s : plus une personne passe de temps en d\u00e9tention en attendant son proc\u00e8s, plus elle est susceptible de plaider coupable. Elle offrait \u00e9galement un moyen d'emp\u00eacher les accus\u00e9s de passer plus de temps en d\u00e9tention provisoire qu'ils ne purgeraient leur peine en cas de condamnation. Quatre-vingt-dix jours devaient \u00eatre compris comme le moment choisi par le Parlement pour une r\u00e9\u00e9valuation significative de la question de savoir si la d\u00e9tention provisoire continuait d'\u00eatre justifi\u00e9e.<\/p>\n

Au nom d'un tribunal unanime, le juge en chef Wagner a approuv\u00e9 tous ces arguments, citant explicitement l'argument de l'ACLC selon lequel \u00ab aujourd'hui, comme auparavant, trois mois, c'est long pour qu'une personne pr\u00e9sum\u00e9e innocente soit emprisonn\u00e9e dans l'attente de son proc\u00e8s \u00bb. Les r\u00e9visions de la lib\u00e9ration sous caution de 90 jours sont donc cens\u00e9es \u00eatre obligatoires et automatiques \u2013 et doivent \u00eatre effectu\u00e9es rapidement par l'institution qui a la garde de l'accus\u00e9. La question \u00e0 laquelle le juge doit r\u00e9pondre lors d'une d\u00e9cision fond\u00e9e sur l'art. 525 est de savoir si le maintien en d\u00e9tention de l'accus\u00e9 est justifi\u00e9, au sens de l'art. 515(10). Pour d\u00e9terminer si la d\u00e9tention reste justifi\u00e9e, le juge doit tenir compte du temps qui s'est \u00e9coul\u00e9 - ou devrait s'\u00e9couler avant le proc\u00e8s - et, surtout, de la proportionnalit\u00e9 de la d\u00e9tention.<\/p>\n

La Cour a \u00e9galement profit\u00e9 de l'occasion pour commenter les probl\u00e8mes affectant le syst\u00e8me de mise en libert\u00e9 sous caution en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, d\u00e9clarant que \u00ab les retards dans les affaires courantes de mise en libert\u00e9 sous caution et de d\u00e9tention sont une manifestation de la culture de complaisance d\u00e9nonc\u00e9e par cette Cour en Jordanie, et doivent \u00eatre trait\u00e9s \u00bb. Il a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que la lib\u00e9ration \u00ab dans les meilleurs d\u00e9lais et de la mani\u00e8re la moins on\u00e9reuse \u00bb est la r\u00e8gle \u2013 la d\u00e9tention provisoire \u00e9tant l'exception. Cette affaire est une \u00e9tape importante vers la correction d'un syst\u00e8me de cautionnement bris\u00e9.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t

\u00c0 propos de l\u2019association canadienne sur les libert\u00e9s civiles<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

L\u2019ACLC est un organisme ind\u00e9pendant \u00e0 but non lucratif qui compte des sympathisant.e.s dans tout le pays. Fond\u00e9 en 1964, c\u2019est un organisme qui \u0153uvre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle du Canada \u00e0 la protection des droits et des libert\u00e9s civiles de toute sa population.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les m\u00e9dias<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Pour d'autres commentaires, veuillez nous contacter \u00e0\u00a0media@ccla.org<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les mises \u00e0 jour en direct<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Veuillez continuer \u00e0 vous r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0\u00a0cette page<\/a>\u00a0et \u00e0 nos plateformes de m\u00e9dias sociaux. On est dessus\u00a0Instagram<\/u><\/a>,\u00a0Facebook<\/u><\/a>, Twitter<\/u><\/a> et Ciel bleu<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dans R. c. Myers, la Cour supr\u00eame a \u00e9t\u00e9 charg\u00e9e d'interpr\u00e9ter une disposition quelque peu obscure du Code criminel traitant de l'examen de la d\u00e9tention provisoire. L'affaire a jusqu'\u00e0 pr\u00e9sent re\u00e7u peu d'attention dans la presse ou dans la communaut\u00e9 juridique. Et pourtant, dans sa d\u00e9cision unanime se rangeant du c\u00f4t\u00e9 de l'ACLC, la Cour supr\u00eame pourrait bien avoir lib\u00e9r\u00e9 un nouveau Jordan, bouleversant profond\u00e9ment le syst\u00e8me de lib\u00e9ration sous caution. Et heureusement, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 l'\u00e9tat lamentable de la d\u00e9tention provisoire \u00e0 travers le pays.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":1863,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,83,123],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2419","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-criminal-justice","8":"category-fair-trial-due-process-sentencing","9":"category-right-to-reasonable-bail"},"yoast_head":"\nCCLA at the Supreme Court: A Momentous Bail Decision for Automatic Reviews of Detention - CCLA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/proces-equitable-procedure-reguliere-condamnation\/la-ccla-a-la-cour-supreme-une-decision-capitale-pour-le-controle-automatique-de-la-detention\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CCLA at the Supreme Court: A Momentous Bail Decision for Automatic Reviews of Detention - CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In R. v. Myers, the Supreme Court was tasked with interpreting a somewhat obscure Criminal Code provision dealing with review of pre-trial detention. The case has up until now received scant attention in the press or in the legal community. And yet, in its unanimous decision siding with the CCLA\u2019s position, the Supreme Court may well have released a new Jordan, shaking up the bail system in profound ways. And thankfully so, given the lamentable state of pre-trial custody across the country.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/proces-equitable-procedure-reguliere-condamnation\/la-ccla-a-la-cour-supreme-une-decision-capitale-pour-le-controle-automatique-de-la-detention\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-03-29T07:45:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-09-22T14:58:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/gavel-scales-of-justice-and-law-books-P6F8T5D.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Guest Author\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Guest Author\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/\",\"name\":\"CCLA at the Supreme Court: A Momentous Bail Decision for Automatic Reviews of Detention - CCLA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/gavel-scales-of-justice-and-law-books-P6F8T5D.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-03-29T07:45:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-09-22T14:58:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/f93b5b418cd10a90d35faf4e64816d1c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/gavel-scales-of-justice-and-law-books-P6F8T5D.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/gavel-scales-of-justice-and-law-books-P6F8T5D.jpg\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CRIMINAL JUSTICE\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Fair Trial, Due Process & Sentencing\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"CCLA at the Supreme Court: A Momentous Bail Decision for Automatic Reviews of Detention\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/f93b5b418cd10a90d35faf4e64816d1c\",\"name\":\"Guest Author\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/70a2873825b6959e219f727fb565b11f?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/70a2873825b6959e219f727fb565b11f?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Guest Author\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/guest\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CCLA at the Supreme Court: A Momentous Bail Decision for Automatic Reviews of Detention - CCLA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/proces-equitable-procedure-reguliere-condamnation\/la-ccla-a-la-cour-supreme-une-decision-capitale-pour-le-controle-automatique-de-la-detention\/","og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"CCLA at the Supreme Court: A Momentous Bail Decision for Automatic Reviews of Detention - CCLA","og_description":"In R. v. Myers, the Supreme Court was tasked with interpreting a somewhat obscure Criminal Code provision dealing with review of pre-trial detention. The case has up until now received scant attention in the press or in the legal community. And yet, in its unanimous decision siding with the CCLA\u2019s position, the Supreme Court may well have released a new Jordan, shaking up the bail system in profound ways. And thankfully so, given the lamentable state of pre-trial custody across the country.","og_url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/justice-penale\/proces-equitable-procedure-reguliere-condamnation\/la-ccla-a-la-cour-supreme-une-decision-capitale-pour-le-controle-automatique-de-la-detention\/","og_site_name":"CCLA","article_published_time":"2019-03-29T07:45:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-09-22T14:58:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/gavel-scales-of-justice-and-law-books-P6F8T5D.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Guest Author","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Guest Author","Estimation du temps de lecture":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/","name":"CCLA at the Supreme Court: A Momentous Bail Decision for Automatic Reviews of Detention - CCLA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/gavel-scales-of-justice-and-law-books-P6F8T5D.jpg","datePublished":"2019-03-29T07:45:10+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-22T14:58:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/f93b5b418cd10a90d35faf4e64816d1c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/gavel-scales-of-justice-and-law-books-P6F8T5D.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/gavel-scales-of-justice-and-law-books-P6F8T5D.jpg","width":2000,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/ccla-at-the-supreme-court-a-momentous-bail-decision-for-automatic-reviews-of-detention\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CRIMINAL JUSTICE","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Fair Trial, Due Process & Sentencing","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/criminal-justice\/fair-trial-due-process-sentencing\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"CCLA at the Supreme Court: A Momentous Bail Decision for Automatic Reviews of Detention"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/","name":"CCLA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/f93b5b418cd10a90d35faf4e64816d1c","name":"Guest Author","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/70a2873825b6959e219f727fb565b11f?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/70a2873825b6959e219f727fb565b11f?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Guest Author"},"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/guest\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2419","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2419"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2419\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6403,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2419\/revisions\/6403"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1863"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}