{"id":10560,"date":"2025-07-24T10:27:48","date_gmt":"2025-07-24T14:27:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?p=10560"},"modified":"2025-07-28T12:36:55","modified_gmt":"2025-07-28T16:36:55","slug":"federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/legalite\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/","title":{"rendered":"Le r\u00e9gime f\u00e9d\u00e9ral r\u00e9gissant le travail sexuel : Une d\u00e9cision d\u00e9cevante de la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Le 24 juillet 2025, la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada (CSC) a rejet\u00e9 un recours qui contestait la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de deux infractions li\u00e9es au travail du sexe dans la loi sur le commerce du sexe. Code criminel. <\/em>Les appelants dans l'affaire Kloubakov<\/em> sont des tiers (non-travailleurs du sexe) qui ont contest\u00e9 les interdictions de se procurer des services sexuels et d'en tirer un avantage mat\u00e9riel, en faisant valoir qu'elles violaient les droits des travailleurs du sexe \u00e0 la vie, \u00e0 la libert\u00e9 et \u00e0 la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de la personne (article 7 de la loi sur les travailleurs du sexe). chartes<\/em>).<\/p>\n

Ces dispositions font partie de la r\u00e9ponse du Parlement \u00e0 la d\u00e9cision historique de la CSC dans l'affaire Canada v Bedford<\/em>. Dans le cadre de l'exercice 2013 Bedford <\/em>La CSC a estim\u00e9 que les d\u00e9cisions ant\u00e9rieures de la\u00a0Code criminel<\/em>\u00a0les dispositions interdisant aux travailleurs du sexe d'acc\u00e9der aux mesures visant \u00e0 prot\u00e9ger leur s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sont inconstitutionnelles car elles exposent les travailleurs du sexe \u00e0 des conditions dangereuses et les exposent \u00e0 des risques de violence et d'autres pr\u00e9judices.<\/p>\n

Les appelants dans l'affaire Kloubakov <\/em>a fait valoir que la loi contest\u00e9e Code criminel<\/em> n'ont pas abord\u00e9 de mani\u00e8re substantielle et rigoureuse les pr\u00e9judices identifi\u00e9s dans l'affaire\u00a0Bedford. <\/em>Cependant, la CSC n'a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 d'accord, estimant que, lorsqu'elles sont interpr\u00e9t\u00e9es correctement, les deux infractions permettent aux travailleurs du sexe, ou aux personnes qu'ils embauchent, de mettre en \u0153uvre les mesures de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 recommand\u00e9es dans le document Bedford<\/em>. Ces mesures comprennent l'utilisation de lieux fixes, l'embauche de tiers pour fournir des services, la collaboration avec d'autres travailleurs du sexe et l'\u00e9change d'informations sur les conditions de travail s\u00fbres.<\/p>\n

Bien que cette interpr\u00e9tation de la loi clarifie certaines des fa\u00e7ons dont les travailleurs du sexe peuvent prot\u00e9ger leur s\u00e9curit\u00e9, elle ne r\u00e9pond que partiellement aux nombreuses pr\u00e9occupations soulev\u00e9es par le nouveau r\u00e9gime f\u00e9d\u00e9ral r\u00e9gissant le travail du sexe. Par exemple, la CSC a refus\u00e9 de se prononcer sur la question de savoir si les travailleurs du sexe courent un plus grand risque de pr\u00e9judice du fait qu'ils n'ont pas acc\u00e8s aux services de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 offerts par les \"entreprises commerciales\", telles que les agences d'escorte commerciales, plut\u00f4t que de louer des services de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 eux-m\u00eames ou par le biais d'un accord de coop\u00e9ration avec d'autres travailleurs du sexe.<\/p>\n

L'ACLC est intervenue dans Kloubakov<\/em> d'affirmer que la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des travailleurs du sexe doit \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme un objectif fondamental de la nouvelle loi sur la protection des droits de l'homme. Code criminel<\/em> \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re des dispositions de la Bedford <\/em>l'affaire. Comme le montre l'analyse de la Cour sur les droits des travailleurs du sexe, il n'y a pas de raison de s'inqui\u00e9ter.\u00a0chartes<\/em>-L'analyse des droits \u00e0 la vie, \u00e0 la libert\u00e9 et \u00e0 la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de la personne prot\u00e9g\u00e9s par l'article 7 exigeait qu'elle compare l'impact des nouvelles dispositions avec les objectifs vis\u00e9s, la mani\u00e8re dont ces objectifs \u00e9taient formul\u00e9s \u00e9tant cruciale pour l'analyse de l'article 7.<\/p>\n

Il est d\u00e9cevant que la CSC n'ait pas donn\u00e9 la priorit\u00e9 \u00e0 l'objectif de s\u00fbret\u00e9 et de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 dans son analyse, le traitant plut\u00f4t comme une priorit\u00e9 parmi d'autres. Il est \u00e9galement d\u00e9cevant que la CSC n'ait pas pris en compte de mani\u00e8re significative les preuves relatives aux exp\u00e9riences v\u00e9cues par les travailleurs du sexe, notamment en refusant aux groupes repr\u00e9sentant les travailleurs du sexe la permission d'intervenir. Ce d\u00e9bat n'est pas encore termin\u00e9, car certaines des questions sur lesquelles la CSC a refus\u00e9 de se prononcer sont carr\u00e9ment soulev\u00e9es dans la Alliance canadienne pour la r\u00e9forme du droit du travail sexuel c. Canada<\/em> L'affaire est actuellement pendante devant la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario. L'affaire est actuellement pendante devant la Cour d'appel de l'Ontario.<\/p>\n

L'ACLC est reconnaissante pour l'excellent\u00a0pro bono<\/em>\u00a0repr\u00e9sentation de Zain Naqi et Annecy Pang de Lax O'Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP dans cette affaire.<\/p>\n

Vous pouvez lire notre Factum ici.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t

\u00c0 propos de l\u2019association canadienne sur les libert\u00e9s civiles<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

L\u2019ACLC est un organisme ind\u00e9pendant \u00e0 but non lucratif qui compte des sympathisant.e.s dans tout le pays. Fond\u00e9 en 1964, c\u2019est un organisme qui \u0153uvre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9chelle du Canada \u00e0 la protection des droits et des libert\u00e9s civiles de toute sa population.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les m\u00e9dias<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Pour d'autres commentaires, veuillez nous contacter \u00e0\u00a0media@ccla.org<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pour les mises \u00e0 jour en direct<\/h3>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Veuillez continuer \u00e0 vous r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0\u00a0cette page<\/a>\u00a0et \u00e0 nos plateformes de m\u00e9dias sociaux. On est dessus\u00a0Instagram<\/u><\/a>,\u00a0Facebook<\/u><\/a>, Twitter<\/u><\/a> et Ciel bleu<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Le 24 juillet 2025, la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada (CSC) a rejet\u00e9 un appel qui contestait la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de deux infractions li\u00e9es au travail du sexe dans le Code p\u00e9nal. Les appelants...","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":4661,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,72],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-10560","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-equality","8":"category-women"},"yoast_head":"\nFederal Regime Governing Sex Work: A Disappointing Decision from the Supreme Court of Canada - CCLA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"It is disappointing that the SCC did not prioritise the safety and security objective in its analysis, instead treating it as one priority among others. It is also disappointing that the SCC failed to engage meaningfully with evidence relating to the lived experiences of sex workers.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/legalite\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Federal Regime Governing Sex Work: A Disappointing Decision from the Supreme Court of Canada - CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It is disappointing that the SCC did not prioritise the safety and security objective in its analysis, instead treating it as one priority among others. It is also disappointing that the SCC failed to engage meaningfully with evidence relating to the lived experiences of sex workers.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/legalite\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCLA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-07-24T14:27:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-28T16:36:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ana\u00efs Bussi\u00e8res McNicoll\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ana\u00efs Bussi\u00e8res McNicoll\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/\",\"name\":\"Federal Regime Governing Sex Work: A Disappointing Decision from the Supreme Court of Canada - CCLA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-07-24T14:27:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-28T16:36:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b9c667f8c5a20d41995d5d373dba5b92\"},\"description\":\"It is disappointing that the SCC did not prioritise the safety and security objective in its analysis, instead treating it as one priority among others. It is also disappointing that the SCC failed to engage meaningfully with evidence relating to the lived experiences of sex workers.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg\",\"width\":2000,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"EQUALITY\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/equality\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Federal Regime Governing Sex Work: A Disappointing Decision from the Supreme Court of Canada\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/\",\"name\":\"CCLA\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b9c667f8c5a20d41995d5d373dba5b92\",\"name\":\"Ana\u00efs Bussi\u00e8res McNicoll\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/00e00b6ddcca3bf43ced4e9a7795e372?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/00e00b6ddcca3bf43ced4e9a7795e372?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ana\u00efs Bussi\u00e8res McNicoll\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/anais\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Federal Regime Governing Sex Work: A Disappointing Decision from the Supreme Court of Canada - CCLA","description":"It is disappointing that the SCC did not prioritise the safety and security objective in its analysis, instead treating it as one priority among others. It is also disappointing that the SCC failed to engage meaningfully with evidence relating to the lived experiences of sex workers.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/legalite\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/","og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Federal Regime Governing Sex Work: A Disappointing Decision from the Supreme Court of Canada - CCLA","og_description":"It is disappointing that the SCC did not prioritise the safety and security objective in its analysis, instead treating it as one priority among others. It is also disappointing that the SCC failed to engage meaningfully with evidence relating to the lived experiences of sex workers.","og_url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/legalite\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/","og_site_name":"CCLA","article_published_time":"2025-07-24T14:27:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-28T16:36:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2000,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ana\u00efs Bussi\u00e8res McNicoll","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Ana\u00efs Bussi\u00e8res McNicoll","Estimation du temps de lecture":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/","name":"Federal Regime Governing Sex Work: A Disappointing Decision from the Supreme Court of Canada - CCLA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg","datePublished":"2025-07-24T14:27:48+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-28T16:36:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b9c667f8c5a20d41995d5d373dba5b92"},"description":"It is disappointing that the SCC did not prioritise the safety and security objective in its analysis, instead treating it as one priority among others. It is also disappointing that the SCC failed to engage meaningfully with evidence relating to the lived experiences of sex workers.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/privacy-judge-writing-N6GSRQJ.jpg","width":2000,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/equality\/federal-regime-governing-sex-work-a-disappointing-decision-from-the-supreme-court-of-canada\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"EQUALITY","item":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/category\/equality\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Federal Regime Governing Sex Work: A Disappointing Decision from the Supreme Court of Canada"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/","name":"CCLA","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b9c667f8c5a20d41995d5d373dba5b92","name":"Ana\u00efs Bussi\u00e8res McNicoll","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/00e00b6ddcca3bf43ced4e9a7795e372?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/00e00b6ddcca3bf43ced4e9a7795e372?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Ana\u00efs Bussi\u00e8res McNicoll"},"url":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/author\/anais\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10560"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10560\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10566,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10560\/revisions\/10566"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccla.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}