rightswatchbuttonagain

CCLA denounces drastic, broad infringements of fundamental constitutional rights in Quebec Bill 78

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) has severe concerns about the constitutional validity of Bill 78, which was passed by the Quebec National Assembly on May 18, 2012. The CCLA agrees that access to education and ensuring that instruction in schools, CEGEPs and universities is open and available for those who want to attend are [...]

CCLA Demands Accountability for G20 Rights Violations in light of Scathing OIPRD Report into G20 Police Conduct

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Media contact:
Penelope Chester
647.822.8764
media@ccla.org 
www.ccla.org

CCLA Demands Accountability for G20 Rights Violations in light of Scathing OIPRD Report into G20 Police Conduct
Calls for Immediate Action from Chief, Police Services Board

TORONTO, May 16 2012 – The Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD) today released its systemic review into policing during the 2010 Toronto G20. [...]

CCLA to Montreal City Councillors: Don't Adopt New Protest Bylaw

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has written to the Mayor of Montreal, and to city councillors, to express its concerns regarding the City of Montreal’s proposed adoption of amendments to a bylaw that would make it illegal to wear a mask during a public demonstration, and that would require demonstrators to provide prior notification to police authorities [...]

CCLA Reacts to Developments in Blogger Charles Leblanc Case

Since February 2012, CCLA has been monitoring a freedom of expression case out of New Brunswick, in which a local blogger, Charles Leblanc, had been charged with criminal libel under Section 301, a contentious provision of the Criminal Code, for comments he made about a Fredericton police officer. CCLA wrote to the Fredericton police chief [...]

Alberta Court of Appeal upholds free speech rights of students

Earlier this morning the Alberta Court of Appeal released its decision in the Pridgen v. University of Calgary case. The case raised questions around whether students at public universities were entitled to freedom of expression on social networking sites, for the purpose of criticizing their instructors and educational institutions. In this case, two brothers, Keith [...]