<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canadian Civil Liberties Association &#187; Liberty and Due Process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ccla.org/category/dueprocess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ccla.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:11:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to Consider Issue of Niqab in the Courtroom</title>
		<link>http://ccla.org/2011/12/08/supreme-court-to-consider-issue-of-niqab-in-the-courtroom/</link>
		<comments>http://ccla.org/2011/12/08/supreme-court-to-consider-issue-of-niqab-in-the-courtroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cara Zwibel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamental Freedoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty and Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Highlights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccla.org/?p=12616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court of Canada will consider an appeal which looks at the issue of whether a sexual assault complainant may testify in Court while wearing a niqab for religious reasons.  The case, on appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal, arose when one of the defendants in a sexual assault case claimed that his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ccla.org/2011/12/08/supreme-court-to-consider-issue-of-niqab-in-the-courtroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press Release: CCLA To Intervene In Occupy Toronto Hearing</title>
		<link>http://ccla.org/2011/11/18/press-release-ccla-to-intervene-in-occupy-toronto-hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://ccla.org/2011/11/18/press-release-ccla-to-intervene-in-occupy-toronto-hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamental Freedoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty and Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Highlights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccla.org/?p=12339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



<p style="font-family: Georgia,Palatino; font-size: 11pt; color: #000000; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;">November 18, 2011</p>
<p style="font-size: 10pt; color: #6d5444; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; line-height: normal; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"> </p>
<p style="font-size: 10pt; color: #6d5444; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; line-height: normal; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;">FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE</p>
<p style="font-size: 10pt; color: #6d5444; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; line-height: normal; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"> </p>
<p style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ccla.org/2011/11/18/press-release-ccla-to-intervene-in-occupy-toronto-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Rules Defence has Right to Investigate &#8216;Informer Identity&#8217; Lawfully</title>
		<link>http://ccla.org/2011/11/01/supreme-court-rules-defence-has-right-to-investigate-informer-identity-lawfully/</link>
		<comments>http://ccla.org/2011/11/01/supreme-court-rules-defence-has-right-to-investigate-informer-identity-lawfully/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sukanya Pillay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fair Trial and Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty and Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccla.org/?p=12260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court of Canada last week released an important decision regarding informer privilege.  The Court ruled that the informer privilege cannot be extended to prevent the defence, or agent, from conducting a lawful investigation into the identity of the informer &#8212; this was the position taken by the CCLA in our intervention in this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ccla.org/2011/11/01/supreme-court-rules-defence-has-right-to-investigate-informer-identity-lawfully/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Tough on crime’ is not a national mental-health strategy</title>
		<link>http://ccla.org/2011/10/21/%e2%80%98tough-on-crime%e2%80%99-is-not-a-national-mental-health-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://ccla.org/2011/10/21/%e2%80%98tough-on-crime%e2%80%99-is-not-a-national-mental-health-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberty and Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia and Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op-Ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccla.org/?p=12213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This op-ed was originally published by Post Media News on October 21, 2011</p>
<p>The numbers are stark. Approximately a quarter of all individuals admitted to federal prisons show signs of mental health illness – without counting those who have substance abuse problems – and one in five are prescribed psychiatric medication. Internal Correctional Service Canada (CSC) documents [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ccla.org/2011/10/21/%e2%80%98tough-on-crime%e2%80%99-is-not-a-national-mental-health-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCLA intervenes in Aboriginal sentencing case</title>
		<link>http://ccla.org/2011/10/18/ccla-intervenes-in-aboriginal-sentencing-case/</link>
		<comments>http://ccla.org/2011/10/18/ccla-intervenes-in-aboriginal-sentencing-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty and Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccla.org/?p=12096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over a decade ago, the Supreme Court recognized that widespread racism against Aboriginal people within Canada had “translated into systemic discrimination in the criminal justice system,” with the result that Aboriginal Canadians were “drastic[ally] overrepresent[ed] &#8230; within both the Canadian prison population and the criminal justice system.”  </p>
<p>Parliament also recognized this  “crisis in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ccla.org/2011/10/18/ccla-intervenes-in-aboriginal-sentencing-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mandatory minimum sentences are just plain wrong</title>
		<link>http://ccla.org/2011/10/17/mandatory-minimum-sentences-are-just-plain-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://ccla.org/2011/10/17/mandatory-minimum-sentences-are-just-plain-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberty and Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia and Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op-Ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccla.org/?p=12174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This op-ed was originally published by Post Media News on October 17th 2011</p>
<p>There are many reasons why people object to minimum sentences: they do nothing for victims, they do not deter offenders, they cost too much money and they displace power from judges, who give their reasons in open court, to Crown prosecutors, who make [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ccla.org/2011/10/17/mandatory-minimum-sentences-are-just-plain-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CCLA reacts to the Safe Streets and Communities Act</title>
		<link>http://ccla.org/2011/09/20/the-ccla-reacts-to-the-safe-streets-and-communities-act/</link>
		<comments>http://ccla.org/2011/09/20/the-ccla-reacts-to-the-safe-streets-and-communities-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 02:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Norton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberty and Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccla.org/?p=11929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On September 20, Justice Minister Robert Nicholson tabled the much anticipated Safe Streets and Communities Act, which bundles nine pieces of legislation from past sessions of Parliament together into a single omnibus bill. While this bill includes many core components of the government’s criminal law agenda, further enhancements of police powers are also expected to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ccla.org/2011/09/20/the-ccla-reacts-to-the-safe-streets-and-communities-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCLA to intervene to promote access to justice and police accountability</title>
		<link>http://ccla.org/2011/06/23/ccla-to-intervene-to-promote-access-to-justice-and-police-accountability/</link>
		<comments>http://ccla.org/2011/06/23/ccla-to-intervene-to-promote-access-to-justice-and-police-accountability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Norton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty and Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccla.org/?p=10985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The CCLA was recently granted leave to intervene before the Ontario Court of Appeal in Schaeffer v. Wood, a case addressing several important legal issues, including:</p>
<p>1.)    the scope of “public interest standing” before courts;</p>
<p>2.)    whether police officers deemed a “subject” or “witness” in a Special Investigations Unit (“SIU”) investigation can share the same lawyer; and</p>
<p>3.)    [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ccla.org/2011/06/23/ccla-to-intervene-to-promote-access-to-justice-and-police-accountability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>G20 Fact Sheet &#8211; By the Numbers</title>
		<link>http://ccla.org/2011/06/21/g20-fact-sheet-by-the-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://ccla.org/2011/06/21/g20-fact-sheet-by-the-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[G20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty and Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccla.org/?p=10977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Money spent</p>
<p>-       On entire Summit: approximately $664 million</p>
<p>-       On Summit security: $509.9 million (77% of the budget for the entire Summit)</p>
<p>Number of police &#8211; approximately 20,000</p>
<p>Number of arrests &#8211; 1105</p>
<p>Number of people charges – 330</p>
<p>As of June 20, 2011, of those charged:</p>

270      individuals have had their matters completed:

24    [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ccla.org/2011/06/21/g20-fact-sheet-by-the-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Op-ed: Smart on crime does not mean mandatory minimums</title>
		<link>http://ccla.org/2011/04/30/op-ed-smart-on-crime-does-not-mean-mandatory-minimums/</link>
		<comments>http://ccla.org/2011/04/30/op-ed-smart-on-crime-does-not-mean-mandatory-minimums/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberty and Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op-Ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccla.org/?p=10598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This op-ed was originally published on Canada.com as part of their Real Agenda series for the 2011 federal election. </p>
<p>Trafficking of drugs creates many problems for society. These are  serious problems that affect many Canadians and we should encourage our  governments to solve them. However, this ought not to include mandatory  minimum [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ccla.org/2011/04/30/op-ed-smart-on-crime-does-not-mean-mandatory-minimums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

