CCLA Pushes for Limits on the Use of “Hard Entries”

On November 20, 2009 the CCLA appeared before the Supreme Court of Canada to argue for limits on the use of “hard entries” by police.  R. v. Cornell dealt with the question of when it is appropriate for police to use invasive entry tactics, such as knocking down doors with weapons drawn, when executing residential search warrants.  In the CCLA’s submissions such tactics should only be used when they are necessary to protect officer safety or prevent the destruction of evidence, and even then, only where the benefits outweigh the potential dangers. This obligation should apply in all types of cases, including those involving drugs. To view a copy of the CCLA’s factum, click here.