| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
A downloadable MSWord version of this press release is available here. Contact: Penelope Chester Toronto, ON – July 22, 2010 – The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) continues to demand accountability and civilian oversight for G20 policing and security. The CCLA has appealed directly to the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD) to investigate G20 policing. The CCLA has submitted five institutional and 78 individual G20 police complaints with OIPRD. The CCLA has also called on the Toronto Police Service Board to create a “prompt, credible, comprehensive and transparent” independent review of G20 policing. Nathalie Des Rosiers, General Counsel for CCLA, will be appearing before the Toronto Police Service Board today, July 22nd, at 1:30 pm at the Toronto Police Service headquarters (40 College Street). She will be speaking about the Independent Civilian Review, and will be available for media comment.
It is the opinion of the CCLA that, despite examples of professional and lawful policing, the use of police powers during the G20 Summit in Toronto was, at times, disproportionate, arbitrary and excessive. Certain instances of police conduct contravened international policing standards, constitutional rights guaranteed under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and, in some instances, provisions of the Criminal Code. In response to this, the CCLA has appealed directly to the Office of the Independent Police Review Director – the civilian agency charged with investigating complaints about police services in Toronto – to investigate G20 policing. As part of this efforts, the CCLA has:
While the CCLA is encouraged by the decision of the TPSB to create an Independent Civilian Review, it underscores that such a review is not a replacement for a federal independent inquiry to G20 governance and policy. Nathalie Des Rosiers, General Counsel for CCLA, emphasizes that “federal leadership is needed to ensure that questions such as the choice of Toronto as the Summit site, the structuring and chain of command within the Integrated Security Unit (ISU), the management of security intelligence, and the expenditure of nearly C$1-billion on security receives proper attention and scrutiny.” More info: A copy of the CCLA’s institutional complaint to the OIPRD and its covering letter accompanying the 78 individual complaints can be found of the CCLA website: CCLA Complaints to the OIPRD – details and excerpts. The website also contains excerpts from the individual complaints. A copy of the CCLA’s letter to the TPSB can be found here
###
|

